Original Research - Special Collection: Reception of Biblical Discourse in Africa

COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in South Africa: Biblical discourse

Tshifhiwa S. Netshapapame
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 79, No 4 | a7795 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i4.7795 | © 2023 Tshifhiwa S. Netshapapame | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 31 May 2022 | Published: 03 May 2023

About the author(s)

Tshifhiwa S. Netshapapame, Institute of Gender Studies, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Churches have always been regarded as a safe haven during calamities. This changed during COVID-19 lockdown when churches were forced to shut down. The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a new normal to the world at large, calling for immediate action from authorities and introducing vaccination as an antidote. However, some religious practitioners as a vehicle of change through the institution of the church have been acting on the contrary because it discourages the uptake of vaccines, leading to vaccine hesitancy. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been observed in the Christian community because Christians use Bible verses as a scapegoat for not getting a jab. There is a chasm that exists between faith and science, and it perpetuates the discourse of vaccine hesitancy.

Contributions: This article applies a qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach and seeks to address the conspiracy theories and the use of Bible verses as discourse on vaccine uptake.


Keywords

COVID-19; vaccine; anti-vaccine; hesitancy; Christianity; culture; politics; South Africa.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1734
Total article views: 8330

 

Crossref Citations

1. Pandemic preparedness: why humanities and social sciences matter
Sally Frampton, Kingsley Orievulu, Philippa C. Matthews, Alberto Giubilini, Joshua Hordern, Lizzie Burns, Sean Elias, Ethan Friederich, Nomathamsanqa Majozi, Sam Martin, Austin Stevenson, Samantha Vanderslott, Janet Seeley
Frontiers in Public Health  vol: 12  year: 2024  
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1394569