Original Research

Karl Barth’s epistemology: A critical appraisal

Daniël P. Veldsman
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 63, No 4 | a253 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v63i4.253 | © 2007 Daniël P. Veldsman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 May 2007 | Published: 07 May 2007

About the author(s)

Daniël P. Veldsman, Openjournals Publishing, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (53KB)


Can the great 20th century systematic theologian Karl Barth justify the fundamental beliefs he holds regarding the priority of God’s revelation in Jesus Christ as put forward in his impressive and comprehensive Kirchliche Dogmatik? Is it enough and thus theologically justifiable to simply state in the words of Barth that the best theology would need no advocates: it would prove itself? In my appraisal of Barth’s epistemological stance, I would like to argue in this article that his stance in the first place, does not only lead to a total isolation of theological reflection, but secondly through his highly exclusive claim, takes on the character of a personal religious credo expanded into a comprehensive doctrine beyond any form of control, and ultimately thirdly, becomes methodologically in essence a specifically Barthian theology from below.

Wenn die Theologie sich eine Wissenschaft nennen lässt oder selber nennt, so kann sie damit keinerlei Verpflictung übernehmen, sich an den für andere Wissenschaften gültigen Massstäbem messen zu lassen.
(Karl Barth 1947:8)


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 4259
Total article views: 2643


Crossref Citations

1. Ecology: Its relative importance and absolute irrelevance for a Christian: A Kierkegaardian transversal space for the controversy on eco-theology
Hermen Kroesbergen
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 70  issue: 1  year: 2014  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v70i1.2719