Original Research
Verset en rewolusie
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 51, No 2 | a1402 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v51i2.1402
| © 1995 I. W.C. van Wyk
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 December 1995 | Published: 12 December 1995
Submitted: 11 December 1995 | Published: 12 December 1995
About the author(s)
I. W.C. van Wyk, Tydelike dosent: Departement Dogmatiek en Christelike Etiek (Afd A) Universiteit van Pretoria, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (1MB)Abstract
Resistance and revolution. The communion formulary of the Nederduitsch Hervonnde Kerk states clearly that a church member may not take part in revolutionary activities and that he should obey governmental authorities. Two questions are asked: 1. Does this statement imply that a Christian should obey goverments, even when they are oppressive? Can a Christian do something about his fate, or is he obliged to suffer injustice? 2. How can and must we interpret this principle today in a democratic state where resistance and rebellion are integral elements of the political process? It is argued that in Biblical Reformed theology not only the duty to obey but also the right to resist are justified. Although civil disobedience is allowed, violence is strongly condemned. This article asks the church to adhere to the communion formulary, but simultaniously to realise the vast differences between the sixteenth and the twentieth centuries.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2628Total article views: 1913