Original Research: Cross-cultural Religious Studies

Thoughts on China’s contemporary religious relationship: Discussion in view of current theories

Zhigang Zhang
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 79, No 5 | a9224 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i5.9224 | © 2023 Zhigang Zhang | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 July 2023 | Published: 16 November 2023

About the author(s)

Zhigang Zhang, Institute for Marxist Religious Studies in New Era, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China

Abstract

How to deal with the ever more complex religious relationships is not only a significant issue for Chinese central government and the Communist Party but also a cutting-edge topic for the religious academy at home and abroad. Based on the review of the latest internationally acknowledged four theoretical orientations, namely religious market model, religious ecological model, religious compatibilism, and religious praxism, this article proposes an innovated framework, positive orientating theory of Chinese religious relations. The author intends to explore more active thoughts on theories and policies that would particularly reflect on and align with the typical characteristics of religious relationships in Chinese context.

Contribution: Based on the review of the latest internationally acknowledged four theoretical orientations, namely religious market model, religious ecological model, religious compatibilism, and religious praxism, this article proposes an innovated framework, positive orientating theory of Chinese religious relations.


Keywords

study of religious relationship; interreligious dialogue; religious market model; religious ecological model; religious compatibilism; religious praxism; positive orientating theory of Chinese religious relations.

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 17: Partnerships for the goals

Metrics

Total abstract views: 731
Total article views: 644

 

Crossref Citations

1. Cross-cultural religious studies
Chen Yuehua, Ishraq Ali
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 80  issue: 3  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v80i3.9772