Original Research - Special Collection: Historical Thought and Source Interpretation

Deuteronomy 34:6: Moses’ burial in text and translation

Hans Ausloos
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 77, No 1 | a6779 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i1.6779 | © 2021 Hans Ausloos | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 April 2021 | Published: 15 July 2021

About the author(s)

Hans Ausloos, Septuagint Studies and Textual Criticism, Faculty of Theology, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS); Old and New Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Abstract

Despite the simplicity from a linguistic perspective, the formula וַיִּקְבֹּר אֹתוֹ in Deuteronomy 34:6 has been at the origins of a vivid discussion amongst its interpreters. Most of the time, this formula, in which an explicit subject is missing, is interpreted as having YHWH, who is mentioned in the final part of the foregoing verse, as its subject. As such, it is YHWH who is considered as the one who buried Moses. Nevertheless, other interpretations are equally possible. In Hebrew, a third person singular verbal form can also be used in order to refer to an unidentified subject (‘one’). A comparison of the Masoretic Text of Deuteronomy 34:6 to the Versiones makes clear that the latter apparently has been the interpretation of the Septuagint translator, even if one cannot be sure whether its plural verbal form ἔθαψαν is because of the interpretation of the Greek translator or to a different Hebrew Vorlage. Moreover, the comparison of the different textual witnesses of Deuteronomy 34:6 makes clear that a conclusive answer to the question whether the singular (וַיִּקְבֹּר) or the plural form (וַיּקְבְּרוּ) is the ‘more original’ seems to be impossible.

Contribution: Refraining from historical-critical or theological prejudices, the present article evaluates the possibilities as to the issue who buried Moses, according to Deuteronomy 34:8. It demonstrates that on the basis of textual evidences as witnessed by the Versiones, a univocal interpretation should not be imposed to the text. Interpreting difficult Bible passages is one of the core focusses of HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies.


Keywords

Deuteronomy; Moses; Masoretic Text; Septuagint; manuscripts of the Judean Desert; textual criticism

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1597
Total article views: 2200


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.