Original Research
God, the beautiful and mathematics: A response
Submitted: 19 June 2020 | Published: 17 March 2021
About the author(s)
Peter-Ben Smit, Department of Texts and Traditions, Faculty of Theology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and, Institute of Old Catholic Theology, Faculty of Theology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and, Department of New Testament Studies, Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria, Tshwane, South AfricaRianne de Heide, Statistical Science Group, Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands; and, Machine Learning Group, Centrum Wiskunde and Informatica, Amsterdam, the, Netherlands
Abstract
Volker Kessler (‘God becomes beautiful … in mathematics’ – HTS 2018) argues two points to Rudolf Bohren’s list of four areas where (1) God becomes beautiful should be extended with a fifth one: mathematics and (2) mathematics can be argued as a place where God becomes beautiful. In this response, we would like to argue that (1) the extension of Bohren’s list that Kessler argues in favour of is superfluous and (2) that Kessler makes a number of questionable assumptions about (the philosophy of) mathematics. By arguing against Kessler, we intend to make an interdisciplinary contribution to the discussion about the relationship between mathematics and theology by pushing the debate into direction of a more careful consideration of mathematics as an area in which God’s beauty may become apparent.
Contribution: Contributing to the interdisciplinary exploration of theology in HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, this article further develops the consideration of the fundamental theological topic of God, the beautiful and mathematics as it was proposed in this journal by Volker Kessler, by discussing it from a systematic theological and mathematical perspective.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2821Total article views: 2385
Crossref Citations
1. Mathematics declaring the glory of God
Volker Kessler
Verbum et Ecclesia vol: 43 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.4102/ve.v43i1.2432