Original Research
Pseudepigraphy and the Petrine school: Spirit and tradition in 1 and 2 Peter and Jude
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 62, No 2 | a367 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v62i2.367
| © 2006 Patrick Chatelion Counet
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 15 September 2006 | Published: 17 September 2006
Submitted: 15 September 2006 | Published: 17 September 2006
About the author(s)
Patrick Chatelion Counet, Unversity of Pretoria, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (167KB)Abstract
This article identifies four “patterns of religion” (E P Sanders) in the pseudepigraphic letters of Peter and Jude in order to support the hypothesis of a “Petrine school” (J H Elliott). The first pattern that connects the letters is a Geisttradition (K Aland), guaranteeing continuity of tradition. The second is the interrelationship between faith and ethics (fides quae and fides qua). The combination of sanctification and eschatology is a third pattern connecting the three documents. Finally, two florilegia can be identified (one from the Old Testament and apocrypha, and one from the chokmatic tradition), suggesting a fourth pattern: a warning against ungodliness and infidelity. The existence of a Petrine group could represent a preliminary stage of subsequent Early Catholicism.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 4281Total article views: 4476
Crossref Citations
1. The Amanuensis Hypothesis in New Testament Scholarship: Its Origin, Evidential Basis, and Application
Travis B. Williams
Currents in Biblical Research vol: 22 issue: 1 first page: 7 year: 2023
doi: 10.1177/1476993X231210004