Original Research

In what sense is the Louw/Nida dictionary authoritative?

Willem S. Vorster
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 47, No 1 | a2349 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v47i1.2349 | © 1991 Willem S. Vorster | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 January 1991 | Published: 09 January 1991

About the author(s)

Willem S. Vorster, University of South Africa, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (269KB)


This essay deals with four factors which make the Louw/Nida dictionary authoritative. These include the presentation of lexical meanings in semantic domains, the definition of meanings, the distinction that is made between meaning and reference, and the layout of the dictionary. All factors a re discussed critically and examples of where the dictionary fails are given.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 2506
Total article views: 5633


Crossref Citations

1. Destroying the City, Burning the fields: Towards a New Testament Concept and Definition of Corruption
McGlory Speckman
Pharos Journal of Theology  issue: 103(2)  year: 2022  
doi: 10.46222/pharosjot.103.2041