Original Research
’n Preek vol aanhalings: Miga 1 vanuit ’n redaksie-historiese perspektief
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 45, No 4 | a2342 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v45i4.2342
| © 1989 J. G. Strydom
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 January 1989 | Published: 09 January 1989
Submitted: 09 January 1989 | Published: 09 January 1989
About the author(s)
J. G. Strydom, Universiteit van Suid-Afrika, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (291KB)Abstract
A sermon full of quotations: Micah 1 from a redactionhistorical perspective
In his Micah commentary, published in 1976, AS van der Woude holds the view that Micah 1 has to be understood as a literary and historically-original unit, a sermon which Micah delivered at Lachish. In this article it is agreed that Micah 1, in its present form, indeed forms a literaty unit (a sermon), but against Van der Woude, the thesis is put forward that the sermon does not form a historically-original unit; it rather underwent a historical development in the sense that Micah, in delivering the sermon in 701 BC (not 722/1 BC as Van der Woude suggests), made use of (quotations from) two prophecies, spoken by himself, against Samaria (722/1 BC) and Jerusalem (714-711 BC). The present form of the chapter therefore has to be ascribed to Micah himself, and not to the redactor of the book.
In his Micah commentary, published in 1976, AS van der Woude holds the view that Micah 1 has to be understood as a literary and historically-original unit, a sermon which Micah delivered at Lachish. In this article it is agreed that Micah 1, in its present form, indeed forms a literaty unit (a sermon), but against Van der Woude, the thesis is put forward that the sermon does not form a historically-original unit; it rather underwent a historical development in the sense that Micah, in delivering the sermon in 701 BC (not 722/1 BC as Van der Woude suggests), made use of (quotations from) two prophecies, spoken by himself, against Samaria (722/1 BC) and Jerusalem (714-711 BC). The present form of the chapter therefore has to be ascribed to Micah himself, and not to the redactor of the book.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2292Total article views: 1469