Original Research

Truth or meaning: Ricoeur versus Frei on biblical narrative

Gary L. Comstock
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 45, No 4 | a2326 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v45i4.2326 | © 1989 Gary L. Comstock | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 January 1989 | Published: 09 January 1989

About the author(s)

Gary L. Comstock,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (512KB)

Abstract

Truth or meaning: Ricoeur versus Frei on biblical narrative
Of the theologians and philosophers now writing on biblical narrative, Hans Frei and Paul Ricoeur are probably the most prominent. It is significant that their views converge on important issues. Both are uncomfortable with hermeneutic theories that convert the text into an abstract philosophical system, an ideal typological structure, or a mere occasion for existential decision. Frei and Ricoeur seem knit together in a common enterprise; they appear to be building a single narrative theology. I argue that the appearance of symmetry is an illusion. There is a fundamental conflict between the ‘pure narrativism’ of Frei and the ‘impure narrativism’ of Ricoeur. I give reasons for thinking that Ricoeur’s is the stronger position.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2502
Total article views: 3140


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.