Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
Probleme rondom die interpretasie van die 'versoeningsuitsprake' by Paulus
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 42, No 4 | a2206 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v42i4.2206
| © 1986 C. Breytenbach
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 January 1986 | Published: 07 January 1986
Submitted: 07 January 1986 | Published: 07 January 1986
About the author(s)
C. Breytenbach,, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (193KB)Abstract
Problems on the interpretation of reconciliation dictions in Paul
In this essay the Pauline passages on 'reconciliation'/katallagë, Romans 5:10f; 2 Corinthians 5;18v, 20 are discussed. It is also argued that Romans 3:25 carmot be used to prove that Paul interpreted Jesus' death hupér hemön/pantön as a sacrifice (cf the previous article in HTS 42, 257-265).
In this essay the Pauline passages on 'reconciliation'/katallagë, Romans 5:10f; 2 Corinthians 5;18v, 20 are discussed. It is also argued that Romans 3:25 carmot be used to prove that Paul interpreted Jesus' death hupér hemön/pantön as a sacrifice (cf the previous article in HTS 42, 257-265).
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2019Total article views: 1415