Original Research
Die verhouding tradisie-redaksie in gelykenisinterpretasie
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 41, No 3 | a2158 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v41i3.2158
| © 1985 G. M.M. Pelser
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 January 1985 | Published: 07 January 1985
Submitted: 07 January 1985 | Published: 07 January 1985
About the author(s)
G. M.M. Pelser,, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (332KB)Abstract
The interrelationship between tradition and redaction in parable interpretation
This paper investigates the legitimacy and possibility of isolating the parables from their holistic literary gospel-context for the purpose of hearing and understanding them from other possible angles. The conclusion reached is that the parables as aesthetic objects (Via) have a certain independence and that they contend with the gospels for the focal attention of the reader. As metaphors they are generative of multiple meanings and their 'meaning' cannot be one-sidedly forclosed in their present literary context or in some historical moment. When the parables are read as part and parcel of Ihe gospels as Hterary macro-Gestalten this holistic context, however, should not be ignored.
This paper investigates the legitimacy and possibility of isolating the parables from their holistic literary gospel-context for the purpose of hearing and understanding them from other possible angles. The conclusion reached is that the parables as aesthetic objects (Via) have a certain independence and that they contend with the gospels for the focal attention of the reader. As metaphors they are generative of multiple meanings and their 'meaning' cannot be one-sidedly forclosed in their present literary context or in some historical moment. When the parables are read as part and parcel of Ihe gospels as Hterary macro-Gestalten this holistic context, however, should not be ignored.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2293Total article views: 1299