Original Research

Todorov, Levinas and anti-totalitarian humanism: A perspective on contemporary utopian thought

Salomon J. Terreblanche
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 63, No 1 | a203 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v63i1.203 | © 2007 Salomon J. Terreblanche | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 04 May 2007 | Published: 08 May 2007

About the author(s)

Salomon J. Terreblanche, University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (160KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


This article explores the significance of anti-totalitarian humanism for contemporary moral and social philosophy, with special reference to the thinking of Emmanuel Levinas (1906-1995). Special use is made of Tzvetan Todorov’s (1939) work “Hope and memory” to clarify the framework within which anti-totalitarian humanism takes shape, and also to shed light on the relation, similarities and disagreements between the totalitarian utopianism that characterized twentieth century fascist regimes, and other versions and residues of the utopian tradition, such as we encounter in Levinas and the early generation of Neo-Marxist philosophers. Levinas’ attempt in his early works to develop a humanism that is founded in both everyday material existence and interpersonal relationships is then examined in closer detail. Interpretations of the utopian significance of his phenomenological notions such as death, time and sociality, Messianic hope, despair and moral repair are offered. It is emphasized that Levinas’ early notion of innerworldly bliss constitutes a utopian core in his thought that is to be separate from the notion of innerworldly bliss that characterizes totalitarian utopianism, and also undermines the philosophical foundations of totalitarian utopianism.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 2207
Total article views: 1626

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.