Original Research

Dualistiese antropologie by Paulus?

G. M.M. Pelser
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 56, No 2/3 | a1745 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v56i2/3.1745 | © 2000 G. M.M. Pelser | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 14 December 2000 | Published: 14 December 2000

About the author(s)

G. M.M. Pelser, Departement Nuwe-Testamentiese Wetenskap, Universiteit van Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (1MB)

Abstract

Dualistic anthropology in Paul? The question as to whether Paul's anthropology can be qualified as dualistic is, with a few exceptions, usually answered in the negative. However, although the vast majority of scholars favour the negative answer, it cannot be denied that there are instances in the Pauline correspondence which are suspect, to say the least. It is for this reason that the debate has not come to a rest yet, and that the issue is still raised from time to time. The present study was prompted by recent contributions to the debate, especially those of Boyarin (1994) and Crossan (1998), in which it is claimed that Paul's anthropology can indeed be qualified as dualistic. The outcome of the study is that one has every reason to believe that in a number of passages Paul not only made use of dualistic terminology and concepts, but that he actually also conceived of human existence in a dualistic manner.

Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2508
Total article views: 1725

 

Crossref Citations

1. Body, Mind, and Passions in Romans: Paul’s Alternative View within His Philosophical and Religious Context
Craig Keener
The Biblical Annals  vol: 12  issue: 2  first page: 255  year: 2022  
doi: 10.31743/biban.13476