Original Research - Special Collection: P.M. Venter Dedication

Invitations and excuses that are not invitations and excuses: Gossip in Luke 14:18–20

Ernest van Eck
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 68, No 1 | a1243 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v68i1.1243 | © 2012 Ernest van Eck | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 March 2012 | Published: 15 August 2012

About the author(s)

Ernest van Eck, Department of New Testament Studies, University of Pretoria, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

In modern Western culture, gossip is seen as a malicious activity that should be avoided. In ancient oral-cultures, gossip as a cultural form did not have this negative connotation. Gossip was a necessary social game that enabled the flow of information. This information was used in the gossip network of communities to clarify, maintain and enforce group values, facilitate group formation and boundary maintenance and assess the morality of individuals. Gossip was a natural and spontaneous recurring form of social organisation. This understanding of gossip is used to interpret the two invitations and three excuses in the parable of the Feast (Lk 14:16a–23). The conclusion reached is that gossip, when understood as a social game, can be a useful tool to curb anachronistic and ethnocentristic readings of texts produced by cultures different from that of modern interpreters analysing these texts.

Keywords

social-scientific criticism; gossip; parables; gospel of Luke; parable of the Feast

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2759
Total article views: 6060

 

Crossref Citations

1. The parable of the Feast (Lk 14:16b–23): Breaking down boundaries and discerning a theological–spatial justice agenda
Ernest Van Eck, Wayne Renkin, Ezekiel Ntakirutimana
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 72  issue: 1  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v72i1.3512