Original Research

Jesus en geweld: Markus 12:1-12 (en par) en Thomas 65

Ernest van Eck
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 64, No 4 | a100 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v64i4.100 | © 2008 Ernest van Eck | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 16 January 2008 | Published: 16 January 2008

About the author(s)

Ernest van Eck, Universiteit van Pretoria, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (229KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


Jesus and violence: Mark 12:1-12 (and par) and Thomas 65

As an advanced agrarian (aristocratic) society, first- century Palestine’s social fabric was built on systemic tensions and conflicts between the elite (rulers) and the peasantry (the ruled). At the root of these conflicts were incompatible values (ideologies) and interests. Mediterraneans in general were agonistic (fight-prone) in nature – hence willing to engage in physical conflict at the slightest provocation. Violence in the first-century, however, was more than just physical conflict – it was establishment violence. What was Jesus’ stance on violence? An ideological-critical reading of Mark 12:1-12 (and par) indicates that the canonical versions of the Tenants – in which Jesus condones violence – cannot be seen as reflecting the historical Jesus’ attitude towards violence. Jesus’ stance on violence is rather reflected in GThom 65, in which Jesus is pictured as criticizing all kinds of violence. This study also reiterates the necessity of reading the Biblical text from an ideological-critical perspective to avoid the peril of “gospelizing” Jesus.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 3023
Total article views: 2023


Crossref Citations

1. When patrons are patrons: A social-scientific and realistic reading of the parable of the Feast (Lk 14:16b–23)
Ernest Van Eck
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies  vol: 69  issue: 1  year: 2013  
doi: 10.4102/hts.v69i1.1375