About the Author(s)


    Ernst M. Conradie Email symbol
    Department of Religion and Theology, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

    Citation


    Conradie, E.M., 2021, ‘Erratum: Why cannot the term development just be dropped altogether? Some reflections on the concept of maturation as alternative to development discourse’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 77(1), a7020. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i1.7020

    Note: DOI link to the original article: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3415.

    Correction

    Erratum: Why cannot the term development just be dropped altogether? Some reflections on the concept of maturation as alternative to development discourse

    Ernst M. Conradie

    Published: 18 Nov. 2021

    Copyright: © 2021. The Author(s). Licensee: AOSIS.
    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    In the version of this article initially published, Conradie, E.M., 2016, ‘Why cannot the term development just be dropped altogether? Some reflections on the concept of maturation as alternative to development discourse’, HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 72(4), a3415. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v72i4.3415, on page 1, the third paragraph, was set incorrectly.

    The sentence is therefore corrected to:

    As Aristotle already realised, a metaphor requires the ability to see the similar in the dissimilar, what David Tracy (1981) calls an analogical imagination (see also Conradie 1992).

    This correction does not alter the study’s findings of significance or overall interpretation of the study results. The publisher apologises for any inconvenience caused.



    Crossref Citations

    No related citations found.