<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">HTS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0259-9422</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2072-8050</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AOSIS</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">HTS-74-4961</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/hts.v74i1.4961</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Is intuition associated with ethical decision-making?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-8153</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Jen-Sheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname>
<given-names>Yen-Yi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0002">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Wen-Cheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0003">3</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AF0001"><label>1</label>College of Business, Feng-Chia University, Taiwan</aff>
<aff id="AF0002"><label>2</label>Department of Healthcare Administration, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan</aff>
<aff id="AF0003"><label>3</label>Department of Taiwanese Literature, Providence University, Taiwan</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Wen-Cheng Huang, <email xlink:href="uchuang@gm.pu.edu.tw">uchuang@gm.pu.edu.tw</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date>
<volume>74</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>4961</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>05</month><year>2018</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2018. The Authors</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The relationship between intuition and ethical decision-making has been researched extensively during the past two decades. This study aimed at exploring empirically observable associations between intuition and the moral intensity of ethical decision-making processes. A scenario-based quantitative approach was used to collect data from 157 practising professional spirit mediums. It was found that only collective universal intuition had a significant positive association with the moral intensity of ethical decision-making processes. Personal experience intuition and collective archetype intuition were not significantly associated with moral intensity. This may explain why previous studies were unable to gauge the effects of intuition on ethical decision-making. The results suggest that a pure mind can improve one&#x2019;s ability to make decisions. Thus, decision-makers would benefit by being more attuned to their sense of morality.</p>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s0001">
<title>Introduction</title>
<sec id="s20002">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Intuition has been found to considerably influence how people react to judgements (Dutton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0020">2010</xref>). Intuition was defined by Jung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">[1923] 1921</xref>) as:</p>
<disp-quote>
<p>the function that mediates perceptions in an unconscious way. Everything can be the focus of this perception, outer or inner objects, or their relationships &#x2026; it is neither sense perception, nor feeling, nor intellectual inference, although it may also appear in their forms. (p. 462)</p>
</disp-quote>
<p>Rationalist researchers have suggested that moral decisions are usually based on deliberate reasoning (Becker <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0009">1976</xref>; Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>; Kohlberg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">1971</xref>; Rest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0062">1986</xref>). Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) provided one of the most popular and significant rationalist theoretical models of ethical decision-making (EDM), which not only consolidated previous theoretical models such as Rest&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0062">1986</xref>) but also introduced the factor of &#x2018;moral intensity (MI)&#x2019; to ethical issues.</p>
<p>Following decades of rationalist dominance under the auspices of a cognitive paradigm (Kohlberg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">1971</xref>), moral psychology has turned towards emotion and intuition in studying decisions and decision-making (Ellertson, Ingerson &#x0026; Richard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2016</xref>; Haidt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>; Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>; Sonenshein <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0074">2007</xref>). According to Haidt&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>) social intuitionist model, moral judgements are caused by rapid moral intuitions, which are accompanied by post-hoc moral reasoning. Sonenshein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0074">2007</xref>) also argues that people facing an ethical issue make intuitive judgements instantaneously and that these judgements are followed by explanations and justifications. Therefore, as Mikhail (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0053">2007</xref>) states, it is necessary to build on the models and arguments that accord intuition an important role in EDM processes.</p>
<p>The nature of the interplay between intuition and Jones&#x2019;s &#x2018;MI&#x2019; is yet to be determined. Kahneman (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">2003</xref>) stated that intuition typically operates in a fast, automatic, effortless, associative and often emotionally charged manner. Monin, Pizarro and Beer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0054">2007</xref>) argue that intuition may be thought of as a behavioural guide or an evaluation that immediately follows an emotional experience. However, according to Jones&#x2019;s issue-contingent perspective, high MI leads to higher levels of cognitive moral development, which, in turn, results in a greater number of moral intentions and actions. Unconscious intuition may also influence MI, which drives unconscious moral intent. In other words, MI can be an intermediary between moral intuition and moral action.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20003">
<title>Trends</title>
<p>Although these studies claim that we arrive at moral verdicts on the basis of our emotionally charged intuitions, there is not enough evidence to state that intuitions are indeed involved in EDM processes (Ayoun, Rowe &#x0026; Yassine <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2015</xref>; Tingh&#x00F6;g et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0081">2016</xref>). Moreover, moral judgements and actions are likely to be influenced by processes that are largely unconscious; therefore, it is difficult to determine what really drives moral behaviour (Sauer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0064">2012</xref>). Arnold, Goodpaster and Weaver (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2016</xref>) contend that research on ethical behaviour is fraught with limitations. In particular, they argue that the normative perspective of these studies is mostly limited to Western morality and that studies regarding empirical and normative business ethics typically focus on either isolated individuals or group actor(s) in large corporations.</p>
<p>To overcome these research limitations, the present study focuses on spirit mediums (as a special sample) to provide a new perspective. Working with knowledge and particularly with mixed intuition and symbolic shorthand often leads to the awakening of mediumship (Tribodeau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0083">2009</xref>). Assisted by rigorous religious training, spirit mediums may have attained higher levels of consciousness when compared with ordinary people. Spirit mediums utilise their special psychic abilities to interact with spirits and deities. This interaction is marked by the use of special language, dance and what may be magic spells to eliminate evils and seek blessing. Spirit mediums can also sense the power of the spirits that they interact with.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20004">
<title>Purpose</title>
<p>The purpose of this research is to determine whether intuition is associated with the MI involved in EDM, thereby adding to the body of knowledge on EDM. Drawing from Jung&#x2019;s classification of the unconscious, this article divides intuition into three types: personal experience intuition (PEI), collective archetype intuition (CAI) and collective universal intuition (CUI). In addition, the article also explores the relationships of MI with (1) moral recognition, with (2) moral judgement and with (3) moral intention in Jones&#x2019;s issue-contingent model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20005">
<title>Contribution to field</title>
<p>Mediumship is a specific form of knowing that allows it to be extended on behalf of others (Clart <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2003</xref>; Sutton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0078">1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0079">1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0080">2003</xref>; Tribodeau <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0083">2009</xref>; Zheng <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0091">2016</xref>). For this research, 200 Taiwanese spirit mediums were contacted, and the findings can help to enrich our understanding of intuition and moral judgement. In addition, the inclusion of non-students and non-managers ensures that the findings are generalisable. In cases where there exist systematic differences, this can serve to flesh out our understanding of earlier, biased studies (Henry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2008</xref>; Peterson <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0059">2001</xref>; Sears <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0067">1986</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0006">
<title>Literature review</title>
<sec id="s20007">
<title>Theoretical descriptive ethical decision-making approaches</title>
<p>Three general EDM theoretical models have been proposed in previous research: (1) rationalist, (2) non-rationalist and (3) integrated. Although rationalist approaches have tended to include the notion that intuition or emotion might play a role in EDM, they do not consider moral intuition to be a determination of moral judgement (Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>). Non-rationalist approaches, in contrast, do hold that moral intuition influences moral judgement (Haidt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>). Integrated approaches suggest that there is a concurrent interaction between intuition (impulsive) and reason (reflective) when moral judgements are made (Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s30008">
<title>Rationalist approach</title>
<p>The rationalist approach suggests that when faced with an ethical dilemma, the decision maker attempts to resolve the conflict using a logical, rational and deliberative cognitive process (Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>). Trevino (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0082">1986</xref>) introduced a person-situation integrationist model for EDM, which began by suggesting that the manner that an ethical dilemma is analysed by a decision maker depends upon the individual&#x2019;s stage of cognitive moral development (Kohlberg <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0049">1973</xref>). The decision maker&#x2019;s initial cognition regarding right and wrong is then moderated by individual factors such as ego strength, field dependence and locus of control.</p>
<p>Rest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0062">1986</xref>) posited that there are four distinct process components (or stages) in EDM: (1) becoming aware that there is a moral issue or ethical problem or that the situation has ethical implications (also referred to as recognition); (2) leading to a moral judgement (also referred to as EDM); (3) establishing a moral intent (also referred to as moral motivation); and (4) acting on these intentions through one&#x2019;s behaviour (also referred to as the action). The moral judgement stage of Rest&#x2019;s model, which was seen as a key moral reasoning component of the EDM process, was based on Kohlberg&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">1971</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0049">1973</xref>) rationalist theory of moral development (Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Building on and consolidating Rest&#x2019;s model, Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) provided an important contribution to EDM theory by introducing the issue-contingent model. This model included the important new factor of &#x2018;MI&#x2019;, which considered consequences, social consensus and proximity, or the feeling of nearness. The MI of an issue can influence the EDM stages and can act as both an independent variable as well as a moderating one.</p>
<p>In addition, Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) presented four propositions: firstly, issues of high MI would be recognised as more frequent moral issues; secondly, issues of high MI would elicit higher levels of cognitive moral development, which would strongly influence moral judgement (Trevino <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0082">1986</xref>); thirdly, moral intent would be established more frequently when issues of high MI were involved; and fourthly, moral action would be observed more frequently when issues of high MI were involved.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30009">
<title>Non-rationalist approach</title>
<p>According to the non-rationalist approach, intuition and/or emotion or sentiments are central to the EDM moral judgement process. Some models have placed deliberative reasoning after flashes of intuition or perceptions (e.g. Bargh <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2005</xref>; Haidt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>); some others have put rationality before emotion as a type of unconscious reasoning that produces intuition (e.g. Sustain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0077">2005</xref>), and others still have seen intuition as a type of reasoning itself (e.g. Gigerenzer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2008</xref>). Despite this variety of views, however, researchers are generally in agreement that there is an element of automaticity (whether it is labelled emotional, intuitive or perceptive) in moral judgements.</p>
<p>Haidt&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>) social intuitionist model described two principal attributes: (1) moral judgement is generally the result of quick moral intuitions, and (2) moral judgement is significantly affected by social and cultural influences. In this model, the moral agent is moral intuition, which is a type of spontaneous evaluation &#x2018;at the fringe of consciousness&#x2019;, and while it does not involve a direct evaluation or a critical weighing up of evidence, it can have a meaningful influence on ethical judgements and subsequent decision-making (Haidt &#x0026; Bjorklund <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">2008</xref>).</p>
<p>This work was extended in Sonenshein&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0074">2007</xref>) sense-making-intuition model, which integrated social psychological moral judgement theories (Haidt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>) and Weick&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0088">1995</xref>) theory of sense-making. In Sonenshein&#x2019;s model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0074">2007</xref>), EDM has three phases: issue construction, intuitive judgement and explanation and justification. Presented with stimuli from a context with a high degree of ethically relevant uncertainty (e.g. a potential ethical dilemma), individuals engage in ethical issue construction, a process of sense-making (Weick <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0088">1995</xref>) by which they attempt to interpret the situation they are facing. Reaching a plausible interpretation of the situation, individuals then engage in an instantaneous and effortless intuitive judgement that is based on moral intuitions that have been shaped by their own experiences and social pressure. Subsequently, they explain and justify their judgements to themselves (and potentially, to others) through conscious moral reasoning.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30010">
<title>Integrated approach</title>
<p>Integrated approaches suggest that the two systems (reason-rationalisation and intuition-emotion) operate together and are both involved in moral judgements. Vasconcelos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0086">2009</xref>) attempted to demonstrate that both forms of the decision-making process (e.g. rational and non-rational analysis) coexist perfectly in an integrative frame that takes prayer before intuition and concluded that this religion-based framework probably enables decision-makers to avoid injustice, attract good spiritual influences, repel bad spiritual influences and enhance the accuracy of their final decisions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20011">
<title>Definition of intuition</title>
<p>Previous studies have defined intuition as a function that is beyond reasoning, the purely physical, the cognitive or even the emotional. For example, Barnard (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">1938</xref>) considered intuition to be an unexplainable phenomenon. Barnard considered that the intuitive process was grounded in knowledge and experience and was activated unconsciously or without any conscious effort. Simon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0072">1992</xref>) argued that the term &#x2018;intuition&#x2019; was a rapid problem-solving or question-answering performance, the reasoning for which could not be described in detail. Within this perspective, intuition, therefore, was seen as an outcome of an expert&#x2019;s rapid recognition of a situation that was marked by familiar cues.</p>
<p>Jung believed intuition had three functions (Marshall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0051">1968</xref>). Firstly, intuition is concerned with relationships and wholes (Jung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">1921 [1923]</xref>:568, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0040">1936 [1936]</xref>:123&#x2013;124). Secondly, intuition perceives complete wholes, which can include not only the immediate sensory elements but also invisible, past, future or potential elements (Jung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">1921 [1923]</xref>:463). Thirdly, intuition is <italic>that psychological function which transmits perceptions in an unconscious way</italic> (ibid.:5). It is likely that Jung was inferring that the mechanisms underlying intuition are more unconscious and can be concerned with the collective unconscious (Marshall <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0051">1968</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20012">
<title>Hypotheses</title>
<sec id="s30013">
<title>Three types of intuition and moral intensity</title>
<p>Empirical studies have shown that two components of MI, namely, social consensus and magnitude of effect, frequently influence moral attitude (Shaw <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0070">2003</xref>) and moral judgement (Valentine &#x0026; Fleischman <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0085">2003</xref>). Ayoun et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2015</xref>) explored the association between spirituality and ethics by testing the correlation between spirituality and each of the three moral intensities (magnitude of consequence, social consensus and probability of effect). Hence, the effort to identify individual and organisational factors that impact moral judgement has been partly successful. In exploring intuition in relation to EDM, this article tries to link the MI and intuition that have been validated in the literature.</p>
<p><bold>Personal experience intuition:</bold> The personal unconscious, located at the fringe of consciousness between two worlds, the exterior or spatial world and the interior or psychically objective world (Ellenberger <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">1970</xref>), consists of complexes and an individual&#x2019;s experience (Jung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">1981</xref>). A complex can be imagined as a knot of unconscious feelings and beliefs that is indirectly detectable through behaviour that is puzzling or difficult to explain (Sultania et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0076">2012</xref>). Therefore, the personal unconscious is an organ of thought that has been developed from the results of thinking. The personal unconscious first wills and then discriminates and judges. As to judge is to divide, this division ends in a dual view of existence (such as right or wrong and good or bad). Because willing and thinking are inextricably woven into the texture of a person&#x2019;s unconscious, the personal unconscious plays an important role in the evaluation and assessment of meaning and morality. Intuition from the personal unconscious has been labelled PEI. Because complexes are concealed but affect the personal unconscious, when a person makes an intuitive judgement, personal unconscious intuition may not encompass all the possibilities of whole relationships to make a suitable judgement. Thus, this article proposes the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 1:</bold> Personal experience intuition is not associated with MI.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p><bold>Collective archetype intuition:</bold> The archetype is one element of the collective unconscious. Archetypes refer to the unclear underlying forms from which images and motifs such as the mother, the child and the trickster emerge. History, culture and the personal contexts that shape these manifest representations, therefore, imbue them with their specific content (Jung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">1981</xref>). The shadow archetype is seen as a human&#x2019;s dark side (Young &#x0026; Dawson <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0090">1997</xref>). Jung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">1969</xref>) thought that the shadow was a moral problem that challenged the ego personality. Although the top layers of this shadow contain a meaningful flow and manifestation of direct personal experiences, underlying these idiosyncratic layers are the archetypes that form the psychic content of all human experiences (Campbell <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">1971</xref>). Jung referred to this bottom layer of the shadow as the collective unconscious, which, while originally immaculate in itself, contains a mysterious mixture of purity and defilement and good and evil. The intuition from this collective unconscious is labelled CAI. Because the shadow is so minutely subtle and influences the collective unconscious, when a person makes an intuitive judgement, CAI may lose the ability to transmit a mythological image perception. Accordingly, this article proposes the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 2:</bold> CAI is not associated with MI.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p><bold>Collective universal intuition:</bold> Another component of the collective unconscious is the universal image from which arises CUI (Ruff <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0063">2000</xref>), which, while seen as essential, is also the most far-fetched mythological motif and symbol (Jung <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">1981</xref>). CUI has been regarded as immaculate and pure and is similar to the intellectual intuition of Kant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">1790 [1952]</xref>), who stated that intellectual intuition &#x2018;is not an empirical fact, but the sole fact of the pure reason, which thereby announces itself as originally legislative&#x2019;. Therefore, when a person is faced with an ethical judgement, universal collective intuition may be harnessed to make the moral judgement because it accesses the three intuitional functions for the awareness of relationships, encompassing the greatest possibilities and transmitting mythological images. Thus, this article proposes the following hypothesis:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 3:</bold> CUI is positively associated with MI.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p><bold>Jones&#x2019;s issue-contingent model:</bold> The construct of <italic>moral intensity</italic> refers to the &#x2018;extent of issue-related moral imperative in a situation&#x2019; (Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>:372). MI is a multidimensional construct that contains various facets. This implies that the greater the MI of any given ethical situation and the higher the level of an individual&#x2019;s ethical awareness, the more likely that person is to render an ethical judgement. Further, the greater the level of an individual&#x2019;s ethical intent, the more likely that individual is to exhibit ethical behaviour. Jones argued that any issue can be represented in terms of its MI. MI, moreover, may vary with each issue. The following hypotheses have been formulated on the basis of these statements:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 4.1:</bold> MI is positively associated with moral recognition.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 4.2:</bold> MI is positively associated with moral judgement.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Hypothesis 4.3:</bold> MI is positively associated with moral intentions.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0014">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s20015">
<title>Samples</title>
<p>Questionnaires were distributed to 200 spirit mediums initially. After 43 incomplete questionnaires were eliminated, a total of 157 participants successfully took part in the study. Unlike previous studies that used students or managers as samples, this study took special spirit mediums as subjects. The reasons are as follows:</p>
<p>Firstly, a medium is a person who can communicate with the soul of the dead in spiritualist sessions. The function of intuition in the intermediary state unites mediums with intermediary beings (Pilard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0060">2015</xref>). As a spirit medium&#x2019;s experience can help in understanding the unconscious and human psychology, the spirit medium has become a more common subject in recent psychology research (Shamdasani <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0068">2009</xref>). Secondly, Fontein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0024">2006</xref>) believed that spirit medium performances also involve &#x2018;responding to, and engaging with, the social, political, and moral expectations of those around them&#x2019;. Thirdly, mediums face many potential ethical concerns in their work, such as people&#x2019;s need for protection or the pursuit of material gains (Tsai <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0084">2004</xref>). Fourthly, mediums assert that they channel gods directly (Cline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2010</xref>:547). This is in line with the third intuition type (i.e. CUI). The role of a spirit medium is similar to that of a shaman. A shaman is capable of communicating with the dead, the demons and nature deities or spirits without, however, becoming their instrument or being taken over by them (Groesbeck <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">1989</xref>). Most significantly, a shaman, as an individual healer, can use his or her spirit to travel to other worlds to find and restore a patient&#x2019;s lost soul (Eliade <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">1964</xref>).</p>
<p>How does a person become a spirit medium? Field researchers are quick to highlight the seemingly involuntary character of the process. It has been noted that prospective mediums typically suffer seizures, hallucinations or strange ailments, and these are interpreted as a deity&#x2019;s call &#x2013; a call demanding the individual&#x2019;s surrender (Clart <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2003</xref>). In addition, to become a skilled medium, it is necessary for one to develop the faculties essential to communicate with spirits (Tsai <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0084">2004</xref>).</p>
<p>Spirit mediums use their special psychic ability to interact with spirits. Their interaction with gods and demons is marked by the use of special language, dance and magical spells, which are aimed at eliminating evil and seeking blessing. The spirit world, moreover, is not controlled by a single god; it is characterised by infinite incarnations and boundaries, which generate a special cosmology of the spirit world (Zheng <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0091">2016</xref>). However, the literature on this subject does not mention or provide details about the various deities. Significant studies of Taiwanese spirit mediums include Sutton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0078">1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0079">1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0080">2003</xref>), Paper (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0057">1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0058">1996</xref>) and Clart (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20016">
<title>Setting</title>
<p>This study does not use the &#x2018;trolley problem&#x2019; or any of its variants, which are otherwise prominently used in moral psychology research (Foot <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0025">1967</xref>). Instead, a scenario involving an extramarital affair was devised for the purposes of this research. There are several reasons for doing so:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item><p>Extramarital affairs are illegal in Taiwan, according to Article 239 of Taiwan&#x2019;s Criminal Code, with both parties to adultery subject to punishment.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>In recent years, the Taiwan Judicial Reform Foundation has repeatedly proposed decriminalising &#x2018;adultery&#x2019;, pointing out that the feelings of the couple cannot be resolved by law and that the decriminalisation of adultery is a worldwide trend.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Spirit mediums in Taiwan are mainly consulted for matters involving extramarital affairs. Consequently, mediums face an ethical dilemma in these situations, given their belief in the principle of karma. Moreover, it is not possible or feasible for them to take a moral stance on the people involved in the affair.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The Chairman of the Taiwanese Medium Association also confirmed the relevance of this scenario for the present study.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The &#x2018;trolley problem&#x2019; is more suitable to utilitarian ethics, which seeks to maximise the happiness of the greatest number of people (Barbour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2014</xref>). However, Taiwanese spirit mediums regard all lives equally.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>The results of the survey indicate that the mean perceived ethical problem (moral recognition) score for this scenario was 3.81 on a five-point Likert scale, which indicated that participants generally saw the scenario as an ethical problem. This finding is similar to those gleaned from the results reported by Singhapakdi, Vitell and Kraft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0073">1996</xref>), who found that mean responses ranged from 6.25 to 8.42 on a nine-point Likert scale.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20017">
<title>Design and measure</title>
<p>This survey involved the use of a questionnaire to assess the following parameters: PEI, CAI, CUI, MI, moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention (see <xref ref-type="app" rid="app001">Appendix 1</xref>). All 18 items in this questionnaire were measured on a five-point Likert scale: disagree strongly (1); disagree (2); not certain (3); agree (4); and agree strongly (5). There were several reasons for using a five-point Likert scale. Firstly, Morris and McDonald (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0055">1995</xref>) used a five-point Likert scale to explore the role of MI in moral judgement for their experiment. This study replicated their research and endeavoured to compare results. Secondly, with a five-point scale, it is quite simple for the interviewer to read out the complete list of scale descriptors (Dawes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2008</xref>). Thirdly, a five-point scale was used to increase response rate and response quality along with reducing respondents&#x2019; &#x2018;frustration level&#x2019; (Babakus &#x0026; Mangold <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">1992</xref>). Questions were given in logical order. The scenario was presented after PEI, CAI and CUI. Following the scenario, there were eight items related to moral recognition, moral judgement, MI and moral intention. This logical order method is the same as Fu and Yen&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">2002</xref>) in their study on marketing EDM:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>PEI, CAI and CUI</bold> were measured using three or four items (see <xref ref-type="app" rid="app001">Appendix 1</xref>). Clairvoyance was adopted for CUI on the basis of Jung&#x2019;s belief that it was a type of supernatural perception (Lecture IX 15 December 1933). Jung distinguished between two levels of clairvoyance. The first was the capacity to see or hear things that were normally beyond a clairvoyant&#x2019;s perception; therefore, this level would include the clairvoyant&#x2019;s ability to see or hear entities such as spirits of the dead, angels and demons. The second level pertains to the capacity to access ultimate realities (Pilard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0060">2015</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Moral intensity:</bold> Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) argued that any issue can be represented in terms of its MI. In the present study, MI was measured using a method similar to the one employed by Singhapakdi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0073">1996</xref>). Five of the six original components of the proposed construct developed by Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) were relevant for the purposes of this study. The five components were the magnitude of consequences (defined as the sum of harms or benefits to victims or beneficiaries of the moral act in question); the social consensus (defined as the degree of social agreement regarding whether a proposed act is evil or good); the probability of effect (defined as a joint function of the probability that the act in question will actually take place and that the act in question can actually cause harm or benefit); the temporal immediacy (defined as the duration between the present and the onset of the consequences of the moral act in question); and the proximity (defined as the feeling of nearness &#x2013; social, cultural, psychological or physical &#x2013; that the moral agent has to victims or beneficiaries).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>These five items were combined to form a single perceived MI measurement for analysis as the selected items served as an approximation of the full perceived MI construct. Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) also suggested that MI items might have interactive effects, which would be expressed in the combined measurement.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Moral recognition:</bold> The recognition of a moral issue in a situation is referred to as an ethical perception (Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>). A person who does not recognise an ethical issue tends to use criteria other than ethical schemes when making decisions (Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>). This study checked the mean moral recognition score of all respondents to verify that the respondents (as a group) perceived the situation as an ethical problem (see also Singhapakdi et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0073">1996</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Moral judgement</bold>: Moral judgement is an individual&#x2019;s personal evaluation of the ethicality of a behaviour (Sparks &#x0026; Pan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0075">2010</xref>). Both moral recognition and judgement precede moral intent (Hunt &#x0026; Vitell <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0036">1986</xref>), or a decision is made to act on the basis of moral judgement (Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>). The main benefit of the moral judgement item is that it allows a second rating of moral recognition that detached the respondent from the situation, thereby reducing the bias towards the socially desirable answer (Kennedy &#x0026; Lawton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">1998</xref>).</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Moral intention</bold>: This parameter was also drawn from Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>); this is used to differentiate moral perceptions and judgements from moral intention. In other words, moral judgement was not seen to automatically lead to a corresponding action.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>All three variables (moral reorganisation, moral judgement and moral intent) were measured by one item as did similar previous empirical studies by Morris and McDonald (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0055">1995</xref>), Singhapakdi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0073">1996</xref>), and Fu and Yen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">2002</xref>). The three items were then combined to form one variable (i.e. ethical decision process) to fulfil the structural equation model (SEM) requirement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20018">
<title>Procedure</title>
<p>Members of the Taiwanese Medium Association, founded in 1989, were contacted and invited to participate in the survey. The assistance of the Taiwanese Medium Association allowed the researcher to reach a population that was both widely dispersed geographically and difficult to reach through conventional survey methods. Similar to the sampling performed by Giacalone and Jurkiewicz (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">2003</xref>) and Ayoun et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2015</xref>), snowball sampling was used as this technique has often been employed on hidden populations that are difficult for researchers to access. To ensure that a good sample was obtained, the initial survey distribution specifically targeted the Taiwan Medium Association so as to start with the snowball sampling of the focused population. Any surveys forwarded to expand the sample, therefore, had a good chance of reaching the valid respondents as the target population was diverse enough (spread throughout Taiwan) to accommodate minor dissemination variations. As an extra precaution, a survey question requested for the respondent&#x2019;s job title to ensure that the person targeted was a top-level spirit medium. Another benefit of snowball sampling is that it is expected to encourage participation. A survey that measures sensitive subjects such as spirituality and ethics may be better received through a friend or familiar colleague than it may be through someone unknown. The snowball sample in the present study initially reached 200 spirit mediums, of which 157 valid responses were received. This response rate is 78.5&#x0025; (157 out of 200). The number of respondents compared favourably with other studies related to ethics. For example, Guzak (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0031">2009</xref>) recruited 294 participants, and a study by Ayoun et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2015</xref>) was able to recruit 165 active participants (a response rate of 23&#x0025;).</p>
<p>Details regarding how many mediums were initially contacted by the researchers and how many respondents were involved consequent to this request as opposed to requests made by friends are not mentioned as these do not fall within the scope of this research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20019">
<title>Analysis</title>
<p>The data were analysed using SPSS reliability, correlation and regression analyses. In addition, the SEM and the rival model were also used to test the validity and the model&#x2019;s fit. The use of the SEM is commonly justified in the social sciences, given its ability to impute relationships between unobserved constructs (latent variables) of observable variables (Loehlin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0050">2004</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref> shows the idea value of the model fit index in the SEM. In addition, once a researcher is confident that a plausible hypothesis supports the inferred relationship, they must then rule out the plausibility of rival hypotheses and models (Campbell &#x0026; Stanley <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0013">1963</xref>). If the model survives up to this point, it may be reasonable to conclude, probabilistically, that a causal relationship has been demonstrated (McCoach, Black &#x0026; O&#x2019;Connell <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0052">2007</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T0001">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Idea value of model fit index.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Model fit index</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Index full name</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Idea value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="center">Smaller is better</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="center">1&#x2013;5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GFI</td>
<td align="left">Goodness-of-fit index</td>
<td align="center">&#x003E; 0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">AGFI</td>
<td align="left">Adjusted goodness-of-fit index</td>
<td align="center">&#x003E; 0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PNFI</td>
<td align="left">Parsimony-adjusted normed fit index</td>
<td align="center">&#x003E; 0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CFI</td>
<td align="left">Comparative fit index</td>
<td align="center">&#x003E; 0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RMR</td>
<td align="left">Root mean square residual</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RMSEA</td>
<td align="left">Root mean square error of approximation</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.08</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Source</italic>: Bollen, K.A. &#x0026; Long, J.S., 1992, &#x2018;Tests for structural equation models&#x2019;, <italic>Sociological Methods and Research</italic> 21(2), 123&#x2013;131. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002001">https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002001</ext-link></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Moreover, Loehlin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0050">2004</xref>) and Kline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0047">2011</xref>) state that at least 100 responses ought to be generated to meet the minimum requirements of the SEM. The current study generated 157 responses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20020">
<title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p>Items in the questionnaire were created in accordance with previous studies (see <xref ref-type="app" rid="app001">Appendix 1</xref>). The questionnaire was designed to preserve participants&#x2019; anonymity. Participation was voluntary, and participants were informed that they had the right to refrain from answering specific questions or to withdraw at any time. The participants were also told that the results of this study might be published in professional and/or social journals. They were also informed that the results could be used for other educational purposes. They were assured that their anonymity would be maintained at all costs.</p>
<p>The participants in this questionnaire are anonymous. The questionnaire was approved by the College of Business in Feng-Chia University (No. 20111018P9945756).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0021">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s20022">
<title>Reliability and validity</title>
<sec id="s30023">
<title>Reliability</title>
<p>All measures were analysed for reliability and validity. <xref ref-type="app" rid="app001">Appendix 1</xref> shows the measure characteristics and sample measurement items. For internal consistency reliability, Nunnally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0056">1978</xref>) and Hair et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">1992</xref>) suggested that Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x03B1; is considered to be highly reliable if the &#x03B1; value is between 0.7 and 0.98; that the research can regarded as significant if the &#x03B1; value is above 0.5; and that the research should be rejected if the &#x03B1; value is under 0.35.</p>
<p>Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x03B1; value was found to be 0.801 for PEI, 0.519 for CAI, 0.686 for CUI and 0.743 for MI, with Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x03B1; for all 18 items being 0.759; therefore, the results from the PEI and MI were considered to be highly reliable. The CAI and CUI had lower alpha values (0.519 and 0.686). However, as these were also above the 0.5 standard value, the results were considered to be reliable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30024">
<title>Validity</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p><bold>Content validity:</bold> This article is based on relevant and credible references. Experts in mediumship were consulted both to formulate the pre-test and to chart the questionnaire.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Face validity:</bold> Face validity is the extent to which a test is subjectively viewed as covering the concept it purports to measure. To obtain face validity, the researchers obtained confirmation from the chair of the Taiwan Medium Association (Mr Gao Tien-Wun) to ensure that the proposed scenario (an extramarital affair) was a suitable ethical dilemma for investigating EDM. Thus, the appropriateness of this population has been verified.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Composite reliability:</bold> Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test validity. Boomsama (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">1982</xref>) and Loehlin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0050">2004</xref>) suggested that the minimum sample size should be at least over 100. Ding, Velicer and Harlow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">1995</xref>) believed that 100&#x2013;150 samples are the basic requirement for SEM. Because our sample size is 157, it is eligible for testing the validity by using CFA with no doubt:
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><label>&#x25A0;</label><p>The composite reliability (CR) values for PEI, CAI, CUI and MI were, respectively, 0.805, 0.534, 0.824 and 0.756. For social science, Raines-Eudy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0061">2000</xref>) mentioned that the measure instrument can get the basic stability when the CR is more than 0.5. Because all the CRs were over 0.5, this research had good construct validity.</p></list-item>
</list></p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>Factor loading:</bold> Factor loading was required to be above 0.3 (Vizczino et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0087">2010</xref>). Questions with factor loading less than 0.3 do not have the characteristic consistency of the questionnaire and thus should be deleted (Shyu, Li &#x0026; Tang <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0071">2013</xref>). Because our factor loadings of all items were over 0.3, we kept all items.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p><bold>KMO and Bartlett&#x2019;s Test: The</bold> <bold>Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy</bold> indicates the proportion of variance in the variables that might be caused by underlying factors. High values (close to 1.0) generally indicate that factor analysis may be useful with data. If the value is less than 0.50, the results of the factor analysis would probably not be very useful (Sharma <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0069">1996</xref>). In the current research, the KMO is 0.733, which means that our sampling (157 responses) is adequate.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p><bold>Bartlett&#x2019;s test of sphericity</bold> assesses the hypothesis that a correlation matrix is an identity matrix, which would indicate that the variables are unrelated and therefore unsuitable for structure detection. Small values (less than 0.05) of the significance level indicate that a factor analysis may be useful with the data. In the present study, Bartlett&#x2019;s test is significant, with the approximate Chi-square being 828.250 and df being 136. This means that our sampling is eligible for factor analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20025">
<title>Correlation</title>
<p>The variables for the three kinds of intuition (PEI, CAI, CUI), MI, moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention were analysed using correlation analyses. The correlation analyses (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref>) indicated that PEI (0.088, <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05) and CAI (0.041, <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05) were not correlated with MI. CUI was found to have a significant correlation only with MI (0.237, <italic>p &#x003C;</italic> 0.01). These results provided support for H1, H2 and H3.</p>
<p>When compared with intuition, MI had much stronger results. Perceived MI was found to be strongly correlated with moral recognition (0.319, <italic>p &#x003E;</italic> 0.01), moral judgement (0.455, <italic>p &#x003C;</italic> 0.01) and moral intention (0.306; <italic>p &#x003C;</italic> 0.01). Therefore, the results supported H 4.1, 4.2 and H 4.3.</p>
<p>In addition, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref> shows that PEI, CAI and CUI have no significant relationship with moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0002">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Correlations.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Personal experience intuition (PEI)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Collective archetype intuition (CAI)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Collective universal intuition (CUI)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral intensity</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral recognise</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral judgement</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral intention</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Personal experience intuition</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Collective archetype intuition</td>
<td align="center">0.494 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Collective universal intuition</td>
<td align="center">0.310 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">0.341 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moral intensity</td>
<td align="center">0.088 (0.275)</td>
<td align="center">0.041 (0.612)</td>
<td align="center">0.237 (0.003<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moral recognition</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.085 (0.288)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.007 (0.927)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.089 (0.268)</td>
<td align="center">0.319 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moral judgement</td>
<td align="center">0.001 (0.992)</td>
<td align="center">0.047 (0.562)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.037 (0.644)</td>
<td align="center">0.455 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">0.269 (0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moral intention</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.052 (0.516)</td>
<td align="center">0.014 (0.865)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.029 (0.715)</td>
<td align="center">0.306 (0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0003">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">0.168 (0.036<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0001">&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">0.229 (0.004<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0002">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref>)</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>N</italic> = 157;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0001"><label>&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0002"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0003"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s20026">
<title>Regression</title>
<p>To further validate the results, regression analysis using the three kinds of intuition (PEI, CAI and CUI) as independent variables was conducted on MI (dependent variable). However, the regression models for the MI measurements were not found to be statistically significant for PEI or CAI. The <italic>F</italic> scores were not significant (PEI = 1.203, <italic>p</italic> = 0.275; CAI = <italic>0.259, p</italic> = 0.612), and no beta values were statistically significant for these two intuition types. However, for CUI and MI, the F score was found to be significant (CUI = 9.249, <italic>p</italic> = 0.003), with a significant beta value of 0.237. Therefore, H1, H2 and H3 were supported (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T0003">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T0003">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Regression of personal experience intuition, collective archetype intuition and collective universal intuition on moral intensity.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Independent variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Personal experience intuition</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Collective archetype intuition</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Collective universal intuition</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Standard coefficient (Beta)</td>
<td align="center">0.008</td>
<td align="center">0.002</td>
<td align="center">0.237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center">0.008</td>
<td align="center">0.002</td>
<td align="center">0.056</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Adjusted <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center">0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.005</td>
<td align="center">0.050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>F</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">1.203</td>
<td align="center">0.259</td>
<td align="center">9.249</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">0.275</td>
<td align="center">0.612</td>
<td align="center">0.003<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0005">&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN0004"><label>&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05,</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0005"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01,</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0006"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>A statistical significance was observed for the measure of MI on moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention. The <italic>F</italic> scores for the models were found to have statistical significance (moral recognition = 12.411, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000; moral judgement = 40.543, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000; moral intention = 16.052, <italic>p</italic> = 0.000); all beta values for the measurements with regard to moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention were found to be statistically significant (0.333, 0.455 and 0.306). Therefore, H4.1, H4.2 and H4.3 are supported (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T0004">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T0004">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Regression of moral intensity on moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Moral intensity (independent variable)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral recognition (dependent variable)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral judgement (dependent variable)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Moral intention (dependent variable)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Standard coefficient (Beta)</td>
<td align="center">0.333</td>
<td align="center">0.455</td>
<td align="center">0.306</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center">0.139</td>
<td align="center">0.207</td>
<td align="center">0.094</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Adjusted <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center">0.128</td>
<td align="center">0.202</td>
<td align="center">0.088</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>F</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">12.411</td>
<td align="center">40.543</td>
<td align="center">16.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0009">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0009">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0009">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN0007"><label>&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0008"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0009"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s20027">
<title>Testing the model of collective universal intuition</title>
<p>The model was further examined using SEM techniques employing AMOS software. The results of the SEM for CUI indicated that the model had a good fit (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> = 85.040; df = 42; &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.025; GFI = 0.916; AGFI = 0.869; PNFI = 0.624; CFI = 0.895; RMR = 0.077; RMSEA = 0.081). &#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df (2.025) was lower than 3. In addition, GFI (0.916), AGFI (0.869) and PNFI (0.624) were, respectively, above 0.9, 0.8 and 0.5, which were within the suggested index (Schumacker &#x0026; Lomax <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0065">2010</xref>). A comparative fit index (CFI) (Bentler <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">1989</xref>) of 0.895 indicates a good fit; therefore, the model performed well (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0001">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F0001">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Structural equation model for collective universal intuition.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="HTS-74-4961-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s20028">
<title>Testing a rival model</title>
<p>An emerging consensus in structural equations modelling is the use of comparative rival models (Bollen &#x0026; Long <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">1992</xref>). The extremely parsimonious model used in the current study posited that only CUI would be positively associated with MI, implying a nomological status for PEI and CAI. This study compared (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0005">Table 5</xref>) the CUI model with two rival models, using the following criteria: (1) overall fit of the model implied a covariance matrix to the sample covariance matrix as measured by the CFI; (2) the models&#x2019; hypothesised parameters that were statistically significant; and (3) parsimony, as measured by PNFl (James, Mulaik &#x0026; Brett <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0037">1982</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T0005">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Analysis of competing structural models.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Author to provide heading</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">CUI model: Hypothesis 3</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Rival model 1: Hypothesis 1</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Rival model 2: Hypothesis 2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="4"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="HTS-74-4961-i001.tif"/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="2">Estimate</td>
<td align="left">Collective Universal Intuition &#x2192; Moral intensity</td>
<td align="left">Personal Experience Intuition &#x2192; Moral intensity</td>
<td align="left">Collective Archetype Intuition &#x2192; Moral intensity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.23<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0010">&#x002A;</xref><break/>(<italic>p</italic> = 0.018 &#x003C; 0.05)</td>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.03 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.757 &#x003E; 0.05)</td>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.04 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.739 &#x003E; 0.05)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" rowspan="2">Estimate</td>
<td align="left">Moral intensity&#x2192;<break/>Ethical decision process</td>
<td align="left">Moral intensity&#x2192;<break/>Ethical decision process</td>
<td align="left">Moral intensity&#x2192;<break/>Ethical decision process</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.84<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0010">&#x002A;</xref><break/>(<italic>p</italic> = 0.01 &#x003C; 0.05)</td>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0010">&#x002A;</xref><break/>(<italic>p</italic> = 0.018 &#x003C; 0.05)</td>
<td align="left">C.R. = 0.86<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN0010">&#x002A;</xref><break/>(<italic>p</italic> = 0.019 &#x003C; 0.05)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="left">85.040</td>
<td align="left">110.369</td>
<td align="left">70.821</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup>/df</td>
<td align="left">2.205</td>
<td align="left">2.122</td>
<td align="left">1.686</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">GFI</td>
<td align="left">0.916</td>
<td align="left">0.884</td>
<td align="left">0.923</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">AGFI</td>
<td align="left">0.869</td>
<td align="left">0.826</td>
<td align="left">0.879</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PNFI</td>
<td align="left">0.624</td>
<td align="left">0.630</td>
<td align="left">0.610</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CFI</td>
<td align="left">0.895</td>
<td align="left">0.879</td>
<td align="left">0.903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RMR</td>
<td align="left">0.077</td>
<td align="left">0.071</td>
<td align="left">0.055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RMSEA</td>
<td align="left">0.081</td>
<td align="left">0.085</td>
<td align="left">0.066</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>CUI, Collective Universal Intuition; PEI, Personal Experience Intuition; CAI, Collective Archetype Intuition; MI, Moral intensity; ED, Ethical decision process; C.R.: critical ration (i.e. <italic>t</italic>-value).</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0010"><label>&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05,</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0011"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01,</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN0012"><label>&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</label><p><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In addition, GFI is a measure of fit between the hypothesised model and the observed covariance matrix. Goodness-of-fit index between 0 and 1, with a value above 0.8, generally indicates acceptable model fit (Bollen &#x0026; Long <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">1992</xref>). In the present study, because the GFI for the three models (CUI, PEI and CAI) are 0.916, 0.884 and 0.923, respectively, all the models are a good fit.</p>
<p>Because the model fit indexes of the three models were similar, the CUI model and the two rival models performed well. For the paths from each intuition to MI, only the estimate for the path from CUI to MI was found to be significant (Critical ratio [C.R.] = 0.23; <italic>p</italic> = 0.018 &#x003C; 0.05), which implied that CUI had a significant effect on MI; therefore, H3 was supported. However, the estimates from rival model 1 (C.R. = 0.03, <italic>p</italic> = 0.757 &#x003E; 0.05) and rival model 2 (C.R. = 0.04, <italic>p</italic> = 0.739 &#x003E; 0.05) were not found to be significant, implying that neither PEI nor CAI had any effect on MI; therefore, Hypotheses 1 and 2 were supported.</p>
<p>The estimates for the path from MI to the ethical decision process for the three models were, respectively, 0.84, 0.86 and 0.86. This means that MI has a positive effect on the ethical decision process.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0029">
<title>Discussion and implications</title>
<sec id="s20030">
<title>Theoretical implications</title>
<p>The main purpose of this study was to investigate the association between intuition and EDM. From the results of the correlation, regression and SEM analyses, no statistically significant correlations were found between PEI and CAI and MI from the scenario-based survey of 157 spirit mediums. It is important, however, to recognise that CUI was found to have a statistically positive association with MI. This finding implied that only pure intuition (i.e. CUI) has a positive association with EDM. This finding suggests that because previous studies failed to find pure intuition, they were not able to find the difference in intuitive processing.</p>
<p>Another positive finding of this research was the confirmation of the variables that measured MI. Similar to previous findings by Morris and McDonald (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0055">1995</xref>), Singhapakdi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0073">1996</xref>) and Ayoun et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2015</xref>), it was found that moral recognition, moral judgement and moral intention were significantly correlated with the five perceived MI factors, providing more evidence to support Jones&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>) concept of MI. These findings were encouraging because they provide a method with a psychological and empirical foundation for the evaluation of ethical situations for future management research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20031">
<title>Practical implications</title>
<p>This article defines moral intuition as a type of spontaneous and possibly unforeseeable evaluation that typically occurs &#x2018;at the fringe of consciousness&#x2019;. It may not involve direct evaluation or the critical examination of evidence; however, it is nonetheless capable of exerting meaningful influence on ethical judgements and moral decision-making (Haidt &#x0026; Bjourklun <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">2008</xref>).</p>
<p>On the basis of the results of this empirical test, a framework to assess the stages of intuition development has been created. In the PEI stage, intuition is not empirically associated with MI, which may indicate that there is no moral intuition. Because the personal unconscious lacks moral intuition, a rationalist EDM approach seems to be necessary.</p>
<p>In the CAI stage as well, the results indicated that intuition is not associated with MI. Therefore, an integrated EDM approach may be a good choice as each approach triggers moral intuition by adopting a proposed method, such as by praying, through rational egoism or through personal moral capacity.</p>
<p>In the CUI stage, intuition was found to be associated with MI, indicating the presence of moral intuition. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0006">Table 6</xref> shows the various stages of intuition development. At the PEI and CAI levels, there is no moral intuition. At the CUI level, however, moral intuition was found to be present.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0006">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption><p>Development of intuition and the stages involved.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">The stage of intuition development</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Moral intuition</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Suitable approach for ethical decision-making</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">Step 1: Personal experience intuition (PEI)</td>
<td align="left">There is no moral intuition.</td>
<td align="left">Rational approach (Jones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>; Rest <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0062">1986</xref>; Trevino <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0082">1986</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Step 2: Collective archetype intuition (CAI)</td>
<td align="left">There is no moral intuition.</td>
<td align="left">Integrated approach (Schwartz <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0066">2016</xref>; Vasconcelos <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0086">2009</xref>; Woiceshyn <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0089">2011</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Step 3: Collective universal intuition (CUI)</td>
<td align="left">There is moral intuition.</td>
<td align="left">Intuitionist approach (Haidt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2001</xref>; Sonenshein <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0074">2007</xref>)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0032">
<title>Limitations and future research</title>
<p>An investigation into the relationship between intuition and EDM is a difficult endeavour as they are inevitably constrained by numerous limitations. The different definitions of intuition limit the measurement and comparability of the results of the present study with those of similar research. In addition, research into the dynamic associations between intuition and EDM can be approached using various research questions, designs and hypotheses. The results of this study, therefore, require careful interpretation to ensure that overreaching conclusions are avoided.</p>
<p>This study did not capture the full range of the relevant ethical concerns because only one scenario was adopted in the analysis, which could cause a probable unintended bias towards the Taiwanese context. In addition, because most respondents were Taiwanese, this must be considered when interpreting the results. Including different cultural and religious background variables in future research may improve the ability to more fully understand the nuances underlying the intuitional influences on the EDM process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0033">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Much work has been conducted already to examine the association between intuition and EDM. Although the relationship between intuition and ethics may seem to be intuitively positive, empirical studies of these assumptions have produced controversial results. This study aims to examine whether intuition is associated with the MI of EDM processes, by surveying professional spirit mediums. The findings indicated that only universal collective intuition has a significant effect on EDM, which suggests that a pure mind can improve the decision-making process. In light of these findings, it seems clear that decision-makers would benefit by being more attuned to their sense of morality.</p>
<p>This study has not completely addressed the deficiencies related to CUI. However, if a new CUI theoretical model can consider the primary concern raised by this finding, a more robust model may be developed.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The authors thank the Taiwan Mediums&#x2019; Association in particular for their support of this research work.</p>
<sec id="s20034" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20035">
<title>Authors&#x2019; contributions</title>
<p>All authors conceived the idea for this article, which is based on their research. Although the first author, J.S.L., took the lead in writing, data collecting and analysing, all authors contributed substantially to the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<ref-list id="references">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="CIT0001"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Allinson</surname>, <given-names>C.W</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Hayes</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Management Studies</italic></source> <volume>33</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0002"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Arnold</surname>, <given-names>D.G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Goodpaster</surname>, <given-names>K.E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Weaver</surname>, <given-names>G.R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Celebrating our 25th anniversary: BEQ&#x2019;s past trends and future</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Business Ethics Quarterly</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>v</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>vii</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0003"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ayoun</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Rowe</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Yassine</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;Is workplace spirituality associated with business ethics?&#x2019; <source><italic>International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management</italic></source> <volume>27</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>938</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>957</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2014-0018">https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2014-0018</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0004"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Babakus</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Mangold</surname>, <given-names>W.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1992</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: An empirical investigation</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Health Services Research</italic></source> <volume>26</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>767</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>786</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0005"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Badiane</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Intuitive judgement: A vigilant market learning capacity</article-title>&#x2019;. <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Feng Chia University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Taiwan</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0006"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Barbour</surname>, <given-names>I.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Zygon&#x2019;s dual mission</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Zygon<sup>&#x00AE;</sup></italic></source> <volume>49</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12060">https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12060</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0007"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bargh</surname>, <given-names>J.A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2005</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Bypassing the will: Toward demystifying the nonconscious control of social behaviour</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>R.R.</given-names> <surname>Hassin</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>J.S.</given-names> <surname>Uleman</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>J.A.</given-names> <surname>Bargh</surname></string-name> (eds.)</person-group>, <source><italic>The new unconscious</italic></source>, vol. <volume>12</volume>, pp. <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>, <comment>ISBN9780195307696</comment>, <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0008"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Barnard</surname>, <given-names>C.I</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1938</year>, <source><italic>The functions of the executive</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Harvard University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0009"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Becker</surname>, <given-names>G.S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1976</year>, <source><italic>The economic approach to human behaviour</italic></source>, <publisher-name>University of Chicago Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Chicago, IL</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0010"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bentler</surname>, <given-names>P.M</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1989</year>, <source><italic>EQS structural equations program manual</italic></source>, <publisher-name>BMDP</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Los Angeles, CA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0011"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bollen</surname>, <given-names>K.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Long</surname>, <given-names>J.S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1992</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Tests for structural equation models</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Sociological Methods and Research</italic></source> <volume>21</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002001">https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002001</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0012"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Boomsama</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1982</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>The robustness of LISREL against small sample size in factor analysis models</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>H.</given-names> <surname>Wold</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>K.</given-names> <surname>Joreskog</surname></string-name> (eds.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Systems under indirection observation</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>, <publisher-name>Elsevier/North-Holland</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0013"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Campbell</surname>, <given-names>D.T</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Stanley</surname>, <given-names>J.C</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1963</year>, <source><italic>Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Houghton Mifflin</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Dallas, TX</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0014"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>Campbell</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. (rd)</person-group>., <year>1971</year>, <source><italic>The portable Jung</italic></source>, <person-group person-group-type="translator">transl. <string-name><given-names>R.F.C.</given-names> <surname>Hull</surname></string-name></person-group>, <publisher-name>Penguin Books</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Clart</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Moral mediums</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Ethnologies</italic></source> <volume>25</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>153</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7202/007129ar">https://doi.org/10.7202/007129ar</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0016"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cline</surname>, <given-names>E.M</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Female spirit mediums and religious authority in contemporary Southeastern China</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Modern China</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>555</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700410372921">https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700410372921</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0017"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dawes</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used. An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Market Research</italic></source> <volume>50</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106">https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000106</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0018"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ding</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Velicer</surname>, <given-names>W.F</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Harlow</surname>, <given-names>L.L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1995</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Effect of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>143</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000">https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0019"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dornoff</surname>, <given-names>R.J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Tankersley</surname>, <given-names>C.B</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1975</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Perceptual differences in market transactions: A source of consumer frustration</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Consumer Affairs</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1975.tb00553.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1975.tb00553.x</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dutton</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2010</year>, <source><italic>The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0021"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Eliade</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1964</year>, <source><italic>Shamanism: Archaic techniques of ecstasy</italic></source>, <person-group person-group-type="translator">transl. <string-name><given-names>R.T.</given-names> <surname>Willard</surname></string-name></person-group>, <publisher-name>Princeton University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Princeton, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0022"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ellenberger</surname>, <given-names>H.F</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1970</year>, <source><italic>The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Basic Books</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0023"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ellertson</surname>, <given-names>C.F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ingerson</surname>, <given-names>M.C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Williams</surname>, <given-names>R.N</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Behavioural ethics: A critique and a proposal</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>138</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2628-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2628-y</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0024"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Fontein</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2006</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Shared legacies of the war: Spirit mediums and war veterans in Southern Zimbabwe</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Religion in Africa</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>199</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1163/157006606777070687">https://doi.org/10.1163/157006606777070687</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0025"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Foot</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1967</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Oxford Review</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0026"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Fu</surname>, <given-names>F.L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Yen</surname>, <given-names>H.C</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2002</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Marketing EDM by information service enterprises</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>MIS Review</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0027"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Giacalone</surname>, <given-names>R.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Jurkiewicz</surname>, <given-names>C.L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Right from wrong: The influence of spirituality on perceptions of unethical business activities</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>46</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024767511458">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024767511458</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0028"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gigerenzer</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Moral intuitions = fast and frugal heuristics?</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>W.</given-names> <surname>Sinnott-Armstrong</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <source><italic>The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. Moral psychology</italic></source>, vol. <volume>2</volume>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>, ISBN9780262303002, <publisher-name>MIT Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0029"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Goleman</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Kaufman</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Ray</surname>, <given-names>M.L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1992</year>, <source><italic>The creative spirit</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Penguin</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0030"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Groesbeck</surname>, <given-names>C.J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1989</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>C. G. Jung and the Shaman&#x2019;s vision</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Analytical Psychology</italic></source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0031"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Guzak</surname>, <given-names>J.R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The role of intuition in EDM</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Dissertation for the degree of philosophy</comment>, <publisher-name>University of Texas</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Arlington, TX</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0032"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Haidt</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2001</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Psychological Review</italic></source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>814</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814">https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0033"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Haidt</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Bjorklund</surname>, <given-names>F</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>W.</given-names> <surname>Sinnott-Armstrong</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Moral psychology: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity</italic></source>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>217</lpage>, <publisher-name>MIT Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>. ISBN 9780262303002.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0034"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hair</surname>, <given-names>J.F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Black</surname>, <given-names>W.C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Babin</surname>, <given-names>B.J</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Anderson</surname>, <given-names>R.E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Tatham</surname>, <given-names>R.L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1992</year>, <source><italic>Multivariate data analysis with reading</italic></source>, <edition>3rd</edition> edn., <publisher-name>Macmillan</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0035"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Henry</surname>, <given-names>P.J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>College sophomores in the Laboratory Redux: Influences of a narrow Data Base on social psychology&#x2019;s view of the nature of prejudice</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Psychological Inquiry</italic></source> <volume>19</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936">https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0036"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hunt</surname>, <given-names>S.D</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Vitell</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1986</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A general theory of marketing ethics</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Macromarketing</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103">https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0037"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>James</surname>, <given-names>L.R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mulaik</surname>, <given-names>S.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Brett</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1982</year>, <source><italic>Causal analysis: Models, assumptions, and data</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Sage</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Newbury Park, CA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0038"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jones</surname>, <given-names>T.M</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1991</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Academy of Management Review</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>395</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958">https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0039"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>C.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1921 [1923]</year>, <source><italic>Psychological types</italic></source>, <person-group person-group-type="translator">transl. <string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Typen</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>Z.</given-names> <surname>Rascher</surname></string-name></person-group>, <publisher-name>Kegan Paul</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0040"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>C.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1936 [1969]</year>, <source><italic>Psychological factors determining human behaviour in Collected Works</italic></source>, vol. <volume>8</volume>, pp. <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>, <publisher-name>Princeton University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Princeton, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0041"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>C.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1969</year>, <source><italic>Aion, collected works</italic></source>, vol. <volume>9ii</volume>, <publisher-name>Princeton University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Princeton, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0042"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>C.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1981</year>, <source><italic>Archetypes and the collective unconscious in Collected Works</italic></source>, vol. <volume>9</volume>, <publisher-name>Princeton University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Princeton, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0043"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jung</surname>, <given-names>C.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1989</year>, <source><italic>Memories, dreams, reflections</italic></source>, <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Jaffe</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <publisher-name>Fontana Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0044"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kahneman</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>American Psychologist</italic></source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>720</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0045"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kant</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1790 [1952]</year>, <source><italic>Critique of judgement</italic></source>, <person-group person-group-type="translator">transl. <string-name><given-names>J.C.</given-names> <surname>Meridith</surname></string-name></person-group>, <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0046"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kennedy</surname>, <given-names>E.J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lawton</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1998</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Religiousness and business ethics</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>17</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005747511116">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005747511116</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0047"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kline</surname>, <given-names>R.B</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2011</year>, <source><italic>Principles and practices of structural equation modeling</italic></source>, <edition>2nd</edition> edn., <publisher-name>Guilford</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0048"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kohlberg</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1971</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Stages of moral development as a basis for moral education</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>C.M.</given-names> <surname>Beck</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>B.S.</given-names> <surname>Crittenden</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>E.V.</given-names> <surname>Sullivan</surname></string-name> (eds.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Moral education: Interdisciplinary approaches</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>, <publisher-name>University of Toronto Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Toronto</publisher-loc>. ISBN10:0809117568.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0049"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kohlberg</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1973</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgement</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>The Journal of Philosophy</italic></source> <volume>70</volume>(<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>646</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2025030">https://doi.org/10.2307/2025030</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0050"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Loehlin</surname>, <given-names>J.C</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2004</year>, <source><italic>Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis</italic></source>, <edition>4th</edition> edn., <publisher-name>Lawrence Erlbaum</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Hillsdale, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0051"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Marshall</surname>, <given-names>I.N</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1968</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The four functions: A conceptual analysis</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Analytical Psychology</italic></source> <volume>13</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1968.00001.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1968.00001.x</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0052"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>McCoach</surname>, <given-names>D.B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Black</surname>, <given-names>A.C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>O&#x2019;Connell</surname>, <given-names>A.A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Errors of inference in structural equation modeling</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Psychology in the Schools</italic></source> <volume>44</volume>(<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>470</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0053"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mikhail</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0054"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Monin</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Pizarro</surname>, <given-names>D.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Beer</surname>, <given-names>J.S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgement and the reason-affect debate</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Review of General Psychology</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99">https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.99</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0055"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Morris</surname>, <given-names>S.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>McDonald</surname>, <given-names>R.A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1995</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The role of moral intensity in moral judgements: An empirical investigation</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>726</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872325">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872325</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0056"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nunnally</surname>, <given-names>J.C</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1978</year>, <source><italic>Psychometric theory</italic></source>, <edition>2nd</edition> edn., <publisher-name>McGraw-Hill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0057"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Paper</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1995</year>, <source><italic>The spirits are drunk: Comparative approaches to Chinese religion</italic></source>, <publisher-name>SUNY Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Albany, NY</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0058"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Paper</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Mediums and modernity: The institutionalization of ecstatic religious functionaries in Taiwan</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Chinese Religions</italic></source> <volume>24</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>129</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1179/073776996805307120">https://doi.org/10.1179/073776996805307120</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0059"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Peterson</surname>, <given-names>R.A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2001</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Consumer Research</italic></source> <volume>28</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>450</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/323732">https://doi.org/10.1086/323732</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0060"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pilard</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2015</year>, <source><italic>Jung and intuition: On the centrality and variety of forms of intuition in Jung and Post-Jungians</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Karbac Books Ltd.</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0061"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Raines-Eudy</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2000</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0701_07">https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0701_07</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0062"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rest</surname>, <given-names>J.R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1986</year>, <source><italic>Moral development: Advances in research and theory</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Praeger</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0063"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ruff</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2000</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Skeletal muscle sodium current is reduced in hypokalemic periodic paralysis. US: Hays (Nicolas) Ltd</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</italic></source> <volume>97</volume>(<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>9832</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9833</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170293197">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170293197</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0064"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sauer</surname>, <given-names>H</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2012</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Educated intuitions, automaticity and rationality in moral judgement</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Philosophical Explorations</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.706822">https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.706822</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0065"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Schumacker</surname>, <given-names>R.E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Lomax</surname>, <given-names>R.G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2010</year>, <source><italic>A beginner&#x2019;s guide to structural equation modeling</italic></source>, <edition>2nd</edition> edn., <publisher-name>Lawrence Erlbaum Associates</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Mahwah, NJ</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0066"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Schwartz</surname>, <given-names>M.S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>EDM theory: An integrated approach</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>755</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>756</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0067"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sears</surname> <given-names>D.O</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1986</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology&#x2019;s view of human nature</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</italic></source> <volume>51</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>530</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515">https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0068"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="translator"><string-name><surname>Shamdasani</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. (transl.)</person-group>, <year>2009</year>, <source><italic>Jung. C.G. Liber</italic></source> Novus <source><italic>(The New Book)</italic></source>, <publisher-name>W W Norton &#x0026; Company</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0069"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sharma</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1996</year>, <source><italic>Applied multivariate techniques</italic></source>, <publisher-name>John Wiley</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0070"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Shaw</surname>, <given-names>T.R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The moral intensity of privacy: An empirical study of webmasters attitudes</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>46</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025628530013">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025628530013</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0071"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Shyu</surname>, <given-names>C.S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Li</surname>, <given-names>Y.L</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Tang</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2013</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Applying confirmatory factor analysis on the measure for restaurant over-service</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of International Management Studies</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0072"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Simon</surname>, <given-names>H.A</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1992</year>, &#x2018;What is an explanation of behaviour?&#x2019; <source><italic>American Psychological Society</italic></source> <volume>3</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0073"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Singhapakdi</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Vitell</surname>, <given-names>S.J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Kraft</surname>, <given-names>K.L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1996</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Moral intensity and EDM of marketing professionals</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Research</italic></source> <volume>36</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>255</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00155-7</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0074"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sonenshein</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2007</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Academy of Management Review</italic></source> <volume>32</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1022</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585677">https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26585677</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0075"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sparks</surname>, <given-names>J.R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Pan</surname>, <given-names>Y</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Ethical judgements in business ethics research: Definition, and research agenda</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>91</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>418</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0092-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0092-2</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0076"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sultania</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Kunwar</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Chaudhary</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Yadav</surname>, <given-names>P.S</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2012</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Effect of society parameters on adolescents in depression and increase the suicide rate in India</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Indian Journal of Social Research</italic></source> <volume>53</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>248</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0077"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sustain</surname>, <given-names>C.R</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2005</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Moral heuristics</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</italic></source> <volume>28</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>531</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>573</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0078"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sutton</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1989</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Ritual trance and the social order: The persistence of Taiwanese shamanism</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>A.E.</given-names> <surname>Barnes</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>P.N.</given-names> <surname>Stearns</surname></string-name> (eds.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Social history and issues in consciousness: Some interdisciplinary connections</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>, <publisher-name>New York University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0079"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sutton</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1990</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Rituals of self-mortification: Taiwanese spirit mediums in comparative perspective</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Ritual Studies</italic></source> <volume>4</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0080"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sutton</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, <source><italic>Steps of perfection: Exorcistic performers and Chinese religion in twentieth-century Taiwan</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Harvard University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0081"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tingh&#x00F6;g</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Andersson</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Bonn</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Johannesson</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Kirchler</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Koppel</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>, <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Intuition and moral decision-making-the effect of time pressure and cognitive load on moral judgement and altruistic behaviour</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e0164012</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164012">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164012</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0082"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Trevino</surname>, <given-names>L.K</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1986</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model</article-title>&#x2019;. <source><italic>Academy of Management Review</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>617</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235">https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306235</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0083"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tribodeau</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2009</year>, <source><italic>Natural-born intuition: How to awaken and develop your inner wisdom</italic></source>, <publisher-name>The Career Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New Jersey</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0084"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tsai</surname>, <given-names>Y.J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2004</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The writing of history: The religious practices of the mediums&#x2019; association in Taiwan</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Taiwan Journal of Anthropology</italic></source> <volume>2</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0085"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Valentine</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Fleischman</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2003</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Moral reasoning in an equitable relief innocent spouse context</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>45</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024111814533">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024111814533</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0086"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Vasconcelos</surname>, <given-names>A.F</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Intuition, prayer, and managerial decision-making processes: A religion-based framework</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Management Decision</italic></source> <volume>47</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>930</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>949</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910966668">https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910966668</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0087"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Vizczino</surname>, <given-names>V.M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname>, <given-names>M.S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Aguilar</surname>, <given-names>F.S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname>, <given-names>S.S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Guti&#x00E9;rrez</surname>, <given-names>R.F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>L&#x00F3;pez</surname>, <given-names>M.S</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al.</etal></person-group>, <year>2010</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Validity of a single-factor model underlying the metabolic syndrome in children</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Diabetes Care</italic></source> <volume>33</volume>(<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1370</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1372</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2049">https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-2049</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0088"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Weick</surname>, <given-names>K.E</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1995</year>, <source><italic>Sensemaking in organizations</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Sage</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, CA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0089"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Woiceshyn</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2011</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Business Ethics</italic></source> <volume>104</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0910-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0910-1</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0090"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Young</surname>, <given-names>E.P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Dawson</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>1997</year>, <source><italic>The Cambridge companion to Jung</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0091"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Zheng</surname>, <given-names>Z</given-names></string-name>.</person-group>, <year>2016</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The spirit world outlooks and religious missions of spirit-mediums in Taiwan</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>New Century Religions Studies</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<app-group>
<app id="app001">
<title>Appendix 1</title>
<sec id="s0036">
<title></title>
<table-wrap id="T0007">
<label>TABLE 1-A1</label>
<caption><p>Questionnaire content.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Construct <italic>N</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Content: all are five-point Likert-type scales</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Factor loading</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Composite reliability</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Cronbach&#x2019;s &#x03B1;</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Concept Source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Personal experience intuition (PEI)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">I make many of my decisions on the basis of intuition.</td>
<td align="center">0.717</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="4">0.805</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="4">0.801</td>
<td align="left">Allinson and Hayes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">1996</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">My gut feeling is just as good a basis for decision-making as careful analysis</td>
<td align="center">0.801</td>
<td align="left">Allinson and Hayes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">1996</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">I am hardly ever wrong when I listen to my deepest gut feelings to find the answer.</td>
<td align="center">0.697</td>
<td align="left">Badiane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2015</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">I trust my gut when faced with exceptional circumstances.</td>
<td align="center">0.630</td>
<td align="left">Badiane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2015</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Collective archetype intuition (CAI)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">I get God&#x2019;s guidance from my imagination.</td>
<td align="center">0.399</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="3">0.534</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="3">0.519</td>
<td align="left">Jung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">1989</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">When I follow my intuition to propose an idea, it is easy for the discussion to gain communal assent.</td>
<td align="center">0.592</td>
<td align="left">Badiane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2015</xref>) Kant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">1790 [1952]</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">I understand that my internal voice is from a deity or my ego.</td>
<td align="center">0.579</td>
<td align="left">Own statement</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Collective universal intuition (CUI)</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">I get a deity&#x2019;s guidance by hearing a sound</td>
<td align="center">0.896</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="3">0.824</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="3">0.686</td>
<td align="left">Jung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">1989</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">I get a deity&#x2019;s guidance by seeing a vision</td>
<td align="center">0.778</td>
<td align="left">Jung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">1989</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">My creative solutions come without reaching conscious awareness</td>
<td align="center">0.657</td>
<td align="left">Badiane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2015</xref>)<break/>Goleman, Kaufman and Ray (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">1992</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Moral recognition</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">I think that this story involves an ethical perception</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Moral judgement</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">I think Li&#x2019;s demands are immoral</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Moral Intensity</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">I think Li&#x2019;s demands will cause great harm to Zhang&#x2019;s wife and children</td>
<td align="center">0.711</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="6">0.756</td>
<td align="center" rowspan="6">0.743</td>
<td align="left">Magnitude of consequence</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">I think Li&#x2019;s demands cannot be accepted by the society</td>
<td align="center">0.605</td>
<td align="left">Social consensus</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">I think Li&#x2019;s demands is likely to cause a family tragedy</td>
<td align="center">0.773</td>
<td align="left">Probability of effect</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16</td>
<td align="left">I think Li&#x2019;s request will cause immediate</td>
<td align="center">0.630</td>
<td align="left">Temporal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">damage to the relevant parties</td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">immediacy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">I have a deep aversion to Li&#x2019;s demands</td>
<td align="center">0.339</td>
<td align="left">Proximity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Moral intention</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="left">In the above situation, I would not support Li&#x2019;s requests</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Scenario: Miss Li, who is a young woman, was employed in a technology company as the boss&#x2019;s (Mr Zhang) secretary. She fell in love with Mr. Zhang and became pregnant with his child. Consequently, Li asked Zhang to marry her; however, Zhang was reluctant to make a decision. After she asked him to marry her, Miss Li became aware that Mr. Zhang was married and had a family. Miss Li asked for assistance so that she and Mr. Zhang could get married. The following questions are referenced from Dornoff and Tankersley (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">1975</xref>) and Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">1991</xref>).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</app>
</app-group>
<fn-group>
<fn><p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Liao, J-S., Chung, Y-Y. &#x0026; Huang, W-C., 2018, &#x2018;Is intuition associated with ethical decision-making?&#x2019;, <italic>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies</italic> 74(1), a4961. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i1.4961">https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i1.4961</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>