Original Research - Special Collection: Missiology and Religion Studies and Spirituality

The challenge of consciousness with special reference to the exclusive disjunction

Alex Antonites
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 71, No 3 | a3041 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i3.3041 | © 2015 Alex Antonites | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 14 May 2015 | Published: 13 October 2015

About the author(s)

Alex Antonites, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, South Africa

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


The theory of evolution makes sense of the emergence of consciousness. Reduction is not wrong as such, but must not be totalised. The fact that we are star stuff does not preclude the novelty of consciousness. Materialism is naturalism, but naturalism need not be materialism. Neural pathways are relevant but are not the total picture. The central thesis is about David Chalmers’s philosophy being based on an exclusive disjunction. An inclusive disjunction is, when explained, more appropriate. Functionalism is appropriate. Thomas Nagel’s philosophy on first person ontology can still be maintained. Quantum and complexity theories’ hypothesis on consciousness is more compatible with freedom of decision than classical theories.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 1915
Total article views: 3240

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.