Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Original Research
Die ‘Proslogion C2-4’ van Anselmus van Kantelberg (1033/34-1109 nC)
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 46, No 4 | a2343 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v46i4.2343
| © 1990 B. J. Engelbrecht
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 January 1990 | Published: 09 January 1990
Submitted: 09 January 1990 | Published: 09 January 1990
About the author(s)
B. J. Engelbrecht, Emeritus Professor, Universiteit van Pretoria, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (357KB)Abstract
The Proslogion, C2-4 of Anselm of Canterbury (1033/34-1109)
In Protestant circles students and lecturers usually know the ‘ontological’ (a name given by Kant) proof for the existence of God of Anselm, mostly only from selected sentences and critical arguments about this ‘proof. In this article the full Latin text of Anselm’s proof is given and, presumably, its first Afrikaans translation. Subsequently, summaries of two widely divergent views on interpreting the four chapters of the Proslogion are given and, finally, the Proslogion is very briefly related to the reflections of Wentzel van Huyssteen on the methodology of theology.
In Protestant circles students and lecturers usually know the ‘ontological’ (a name given by Kant) proof for the existence of God of Anselm, mostly only from selected sentences and critical arguments about this ‘proof. In this article the full Latin text of Anselm’s proof is given and, presumably, its first Afrikaans translation. Subsequently, summaries of two widely divergent views on interpreting the four chapters of the Proslogion are given and, finally, the Proslogion is very briefly related to the reflections of Wentzel van Huyssteen on the methodology of theology.
Keywords
No related keywords in the metadata.
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2364Total article views: 1415