Original Research

The friendship of Matthew and Paul: A response to a recent trend in the interpretation of Matthew’s Gospel

Joel Willitts
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 65, No 1 | a151 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v65i1.151 | © 2009 Joel Willitts | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 24 March 2009 | Published: 24 July 2009

About the author(s)

Joel Willitts, North Park University, United States

Full Text:

PDF (776KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


David Sim has argued that Matthew’s so-called Great Commission (Mt 28:16–20) represents a direct anti-Pauline polemic. While this thesis may be theoretically possible and perhaps fi ts within the perspective of an earlier era in New Testament research, namely that of the Tübingen School, the evidence in both Matthew and the Pauline corpus does not support such a reading of early Christianity. In this paper, I argue that an antithetical relationship between Matthew’s Great Commission and Paul’s Gentile mission as reflected in his epistles is possible only (1) with a certain reading of Matthew and (2) with a caricature of Paul. In light of the most recent research on both Matthew’s Great Commission and the historical Paul, these two traditions can be seen as harmonious and not antithetical in spite of the recent arguments to the contrary. My argument provides a further corrective to the view of early Christianity, which posits a deep schism between so-called Jewish Christianity and Paul’s ostensibly Law-free mission to the Gentiles.


Gospel of Matthew; Matthew’s Great Commission; Tübingen School; Paul’s Gentile mission; Jewish Christianity


Total abstract views: 4517
Total article views: 3044


Crossref Citations

1. Matthew's Use of Mark: Did Matthew Intend to Supplement or to Replace His Primary Source?
David C. Sim
New Testament Studies  vol: 57  issue: 2  first page: 176  year: 2011  
doi: 10.1017/S0028688510000366