Original Research

Grace in Second Clement: Priority, incongruity, superabundance, and reciprocity

Devin Arinder, Ernest van Eck
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 82, No 1 | a11354 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v82i1.11354 | © 2026 Devin Arinder, Ernest van Eck | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 05 March 2026 | Published: 11 May 2026

About the author(s)

Devin Arinder, Department of New Testament and Related Literature, Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
Ernest van Eck, Department of New Testament and Related Literature, Faculty of Theology and Religion, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

This article explores the concept of grace in the so-called Second Letter of Clement. Using John Barclay’s taxonomy as a heuristic, the article aims to challenge the notion originally advanced by T.F. Torrance that the discourse lacks any discernible and appropriate understanding of grace. Instead, the analysis reveals that the often-overlooked Apostolic Father evidences grace in at least four ways regarding the gift of salvation: Priority, incongruity, superabundance, and most prominently, reciprocity (circularity). These ‘perfections’ or emphases establish a hierarchy of grace within the overall message, reflecting the communicative goal to evoke a just behavioural response to the gift of salvation. As a corollary, then, the discourse is further situated within a patronage framework that highlights the reciprocal facet of grace prevalent in early Christianity.
Contribution: The article outlines a hierarchy of grace in a document that was previously doubted to lack it, thereby strengthening Second Clement’s position within a patronage framework and promoting the reciprocal facet of grace in early Christianity.


Keywords

Second Clement; grace; Apostolic Fathers; early Christianity; priority; incongruity; superabundance; reciprocity

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 541
Total article views: 542


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.