Original Research
Laylayan theology and Rough Grounds: Theologies from and by the peripheries
Submitted: 10 February 2026 | Published: 26 May 2026
About the author(s)
Fides A. Del Castillo, Department of Theology and Religious Education, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines; and Department of Christian Spirituality, Church History and Missiology, College of Human Sciences, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South AfricaStephen M. Cherry, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Communication and Social-Cultural Studies, University of Houston Clear Lake, Houston, Texas, United States
Jonathan J.O. Canete, Department of Innovation and Sustainability, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Daniel F. Pilario, St. Vincent School of Theology, Adamson university, Manila, Philippines
Abstract
This article examines two Filipino contextual theologies – Laylayan Theology and Rough Grounds – as frameworks addressing the realities of the oppressed and marginalised. Rooted in liberation and contextual theology, these models centre theological discourse on the lived experiences of those in society’s peripheries. Daniel F. Pilario’s Rough Grounds critiques traditional theology for exploiting marginalised narratives without granting them agency, and advocates a praxis-oriented approach grounded in ‘real stories on the ground’. Fides A. Del Castillo’s Laylayan Theology empowers marginalised communities to reclaim their voices and articulate their faith, emphasising inclusivity, solidarity and hope. ‘Laylayan’, meaning the fringes of society, reflects a theology by the marginalised rather than about them.
Contribution: Together, these models challenge the Church and theologians to reimagine God’s presence amid struggles for justice and dignity, highlighting the transformative potential of contextual theology to foster liberation and empowerment.
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 516Total article views: 235