Re-evaluating Genesis 1:27 and 2:7 as historical accounts: A critical dialogue with Geyser–Fouché and Serfontein

Abstract

The long-standing debate between creationism and evolutionary theory continues to shape discourse across both scientific and theological spheres. Central to the creationist perspective are the biblical texts in Genesis 1:27 and 2:7, which describe the divine origin of humanity. These narratives stand in stark contrast to the evolutionary model grounded in Darwinian natural selection, which posits that human beings emerged through gradual biological processes over millions of years. From a faith-based viewpoint, creation is attributed to a divine act occurring within a relatively recent historical timeframe. This study revisits the Genesis creation accounts as potentially historical and theologically valid records, challenging assumptions that relegate them to the realm of myth. Drawing on the theory of biblical literalism and employing theological hermeneutics as the methodological framework, this article critically engages the work of Ananda Geyser–Fouché and Bernice Serfontein to examine the plausibility of a literal interpretation of these texts. 
Contribution: This study offers two key contributions. Firstly, it challenges the prevailing scientific narrative that often dismisses biblical creationism as non-historical, advocating instead for a more integrated approach to faith and science. Secondly, it provides support for faith-based communities grappling with the tension between traditional beliefs and dominant scientific paradigms. By re-examining the Genesis creation narrative, the research highlights its enduring theological significance and its impact on personal and collective identity.