Original Research

Nicaea today? The logic of contextual theology

Daniel J. Pratt Morris-Chapman
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 81, No 1 | a10896 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v81i1.10896 | © 2025 Daniel J. Pratt Morris-Chapman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 June 2025 | Published: 08 September 2025

About the author(s)

Daniel J. Pratt Morris-Chapman, Department of Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology, Faculty of Theology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; and, Faculty of Theology, Wesley House Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

Much contextual theology is implicitly shaped by what can be described as a postmodern outlook. This way of viewing the world presupposes an incomprehensibility between languages, cultures and historical periods. At a conceptual level, this renders dialogue among them problematic. This article explores the use of an alternative theoretical framework, epistemological particularism, in contextual theology. It then examines the practical application of this methodology by exploring the dialogue between Nicaea and the Akan of Ghana.
Contribution: This article aligns well with the scope of HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies as it contributes to a new subdiscipline in epistemology, exploring the conceptual and epistemological dimensions of contextual theology. By adopting a particularist epistemological orientation, the article presents an alternative theoretical framework to the dominant postmodern paradigm that permeates much of contextual theology.


Keywords

contextual theology; Clifford Geertz; Robert Schreiter; Roderick Chisholm; William Abraham; epistemology of theology

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1124
Total article views: 2219


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.