Religious statecraft : Constantinianism in the figure of Nagashi Kaleb

The concept of religious statecraft is a generic lens for decoding the geopolitical dynamics and domestic political religious complex of nations. From the perspective of reviews on the Christian empire of Byzantine Rome and the kingdom of Ethiopia, a comparable narrative is deductible. The kingly personality of Kaleb and Ella Asbeha when read against the background of Constantinian religious-political policy becomes enhanced. Kaleb in his projection postured aggregately as a Constantine, asserting his regional dominance (Bowersock 2013:76; Phillipson 2012). These claims were a continuum of Ezana’s assertion of control over Himyar.1 The resurgence of Judaism in Himyar was a catalyst to a war that basically would be religious (Bowersock 2013:77). The Christianpolitical matrix in Ethiopia found a match in the Himyarite establishment. The Aksumite Nagashi (king of kings) claimed the titles of King of Himyar, Saba, dhu-Raydan, Tihama and Hadramawt as shown in RIE vol. 1, nos. 269, 286 (1991–2000:362–363, 385–386).


Introduction
The concept of religious statecraft is a generic lens for decoding the geopolitical dynamics and domestic political religious complex of nations. From the perspective of reviews on the Christian empire of Byzantine Rome and the kingdom of Ethiopia, a comparable narrative is deductible. The kingly personality of Kaleb and Ella Asbeha when read against the background of Constantinian religious-political policy becomes enhanced. Kaleb in his projection postured aggregately as a Constantine, asserting his regional dominance (Bowersock 2013:76;Phillipson 2012). These claims were a continuum of Ezana's assertion of control over Himyar. 1 The resurgence of Judaism in Himyar was a catalyst to a war that basically would be religious (Bowersock 2013:77). The Christianpolitical matrix in Ethiopia found a match in the Himyarite establishment. The Aksumite Nagashi (king of kings) claimed the titles of King of Himyar, Saba, dhu-Raydan, Tihama and Hadramawt as shown in RIE vol. 1, nos. 269, 286 (1991RIE vol. 1, nos. 269, 286 ( -2000. In retaliation, the Himyarite monarch Abikarib 'Asad, in inscriptions now dated to have been from the late 4th century CE, also claimed to be King of the tribes, that is, Saba, dhu-Raydan, Hadramawt, Yemen, the Tawd and Tihama (Robin 2009:47-58). This claim was buttressed later on by Yusuf the 'king of the tribes' with the support of local clans such as the Y az'anids. Correspondingly, the Y az'anids had the support of the Banü Gadanim of Märib and the Ghayrnän from Sanaa (Nebes 2010:43). This implicatively denotes the struggle between Himyar and Aksum as one that additionally drew from issues of native sovereignty. The manner of warfare that also included trade blockades on important trade routes can be decoded as to have been an attack upon the essential nature of the Aksumite-Himyarite commercial connection; however, as an overall theme, religion covers the battle narrative.
There were many indications of clashing statecraft; Yusuf, who possibly embellished a Jewish messianic cult (Baron 1957:3:63-69, 257-260;St. Gregentius The Dialogue with Herbanus ed. Berger 2012:124-126;Shahid 1976:149), was here posing a challenge to the Judeo-Christian establishment that was represented by Kaleb. As the 'New Zion', Ethiopia's Christian statecraft was parallel to its geopolitical ambitions in the region; this is more so because Kaleb sought the continuation of the antique claims over Himyar -'their inheritance a land of their enemies' (Book

Inceptive persecution
The claim to imperial power as reflected in the titulature over the same regions is an explicit index to the impending war that brewed between Aksum and Himyar. It seems correspondent to the adoption of Cristianity in Aksum Himyarites became Judaic. This theory now affirmed with archaeological evidence deconstructs the notion that the Judaised Christianity that characterised Ethiopia originated in South Arabia. The possible rise of Judaism in the late 4th century CE is attested to by a Himyarite seal that is engraved with a Sabaic name and the menorah (Robin 2004:831-908).
In an affirmative deduction, the epigraphic evidence is reinforced by the martyrdom accounts as recorded in the Ethiopian Synaxarium, Book of the Himyarites and the Martirum Arithae. The first account relates to the martyrdom of a certain Azqir who identifies Jewish rabbis as in charge of his inquisition (Beeston 2005:113-118).
Azqir was from the city of Najran, and he was reportedly killed there; coincidently the persecutions under the Himyarite King Masruq [the comber], dhu Nuwas [longhaired], Yusuf Asar Yathar [Joseph] were also from the town of Najran (Robin & De Maigret 2009; Book of the Himyarites, ed. & transl. Moberg 1924). The persecution of Christians ignited the dynamic changes that stemmed from regional and aggregately global war. From the perspective of how Ethiopia had adopted Christianity and underwent the process of a royal conversion as reflected in Ezana, the involvement of Ethiopia in a region that it had initially claimed to have control over is implicative. Perhaps, the most deductive way to deduce the involvement of Ethiopia is a retrospective reference to Constantine's interactions with Shapur II (VC 4.8-14;Cameron & Hall 1999:156-158;Haas 2008:101).

Constantinian crusades against persecutors: A contextualising comparison
The background to the protracted war between Rome-Byzantine and Persia was the persecution of Christians within Persia. In addition, a connected matter relates to how the persecution of Christians in Persia was concurrent with the Constantinian momentum of the Christianisation of Rome (Long 2013). The reality of a Byzantine imperialecclesiastical establishment that had emerged from the internal rivalry between pagan Licinius and Christian Constantine, and the ideological divergence from the pax deorum and vetus religio [peace of the gods and traditional religions] as held by the persecuting emperors Valerian and Diocletian implied that a clash with a regional anti-Christian power would be inevitable (Cameron & Hall 1999:114;Eus. VC 2.59-60;Lact. DMP 48.6;Lee 2006b:164;ed. Schaff 1855b:490). In a parallel review, the clash between Ethiopia and Himyar as precipitated by the persecutions in Najran was against the background of the Christianisation of Ethiopia and the royal conversion of Ezana (Kaplan 1982:28).
When reflecting on how Constantine reacted to the Persian persecution or rather how he used it as an excuse to engage in an offense against the Sassanians, the Ethiopian attack on Himyar becomes deductible in a parallel perspective. Whilst Constantine's claims upon Persia were limited to disputed borders, such as the Roman stronghold of Nisibis, the extended claims for foreign intervention was the role of Constantine as arbiter of Christendom (Fowden 2006:392). However, the case of Kaleb against Yusuf/Masruq was more concrete, as Ethiopia had been involved in the Christianisation of Himyar, as per the initial engagement of Ethiopia and Himyar during the period 518-522 CE (Gajda 2009:47-58).
In addition to that, the imperialist claims on either side made the attack on Christianity an act of hostility. The Christianisation of Ethiopia had been effected through a royal conversion and the end result was a substantial religious-political establishment that would imply a connection between the clergy and the polity of the nation. Although much of the hagiographies and records of the ascetics and clergy relate to the medieval era, the incident involving Frumentius 2 reflects on the possible King-Bishop relationship in the 4th century CE related to Christianity in Ethiopia (Binns 2017:40-44 Brooks 1923:137-158). Much of the accounts read out thematically the same: Yusuf wanted to eliminate Christianity by eradicating churches or rather making them synagogues and exposing Christians to enforced conversions to Judaism. His main persecution was on the influential Christian inhabitants of Najran as recounted in the Book of the Himyarites (ed. & transl. Moberg 1924). Comprehensively prior to this, Yusuf had been involved in a planned repression of Christians and their Aksumite counterparts in the regions of Zafär, Najrän, Märib, the Tihäma and Hadramawt (Nebes 2010:40). The competing Byzantine and Persian interests on the whole Arabian Peninsula entailed some diplomatic engagements between the Persians and the Byzantines through their proxies.

Diplomacy and the religious implications
The alliances were consequently drawn along religious grounds. Yusuf sent a letter to a meeting that was convened at Ramla where present was sheikh al Mundhir, the Persian client monarch; Abramios, a Byzantine ambassador; and Symeon of Beth (Bowersock 2013:89). It has to be noted that Yusuf's predecessor Ma'dikarib Ya'fur had a cosy relationship with the Christians and was inclinedly pro-Byzantine (ed. Brooks 1923;Shahid 1971:XXVII, 6-10; Symeon of Beth). Ma'dikarib Ya'fur maintained hostilities against the pro-Persian Lakhmid ruler, Mundhir III, whilst he forged alliances with Roman proxies such as the Bedouin; hence, Yusuf was reflective of a shift in Himyarite foreign policy (Beaucamp, Briquel-Chatonnet & Robin 1999:75).
This brings up the subject of wider diplomatic implications on the Himyarite-Aksumite war, which embroiled the greater world. From a perspective that derives from the Byzantine imperial policy, certain observations have to 2.Frumentius (4th century CE) is the known first Bishop of Aksum (appointed by the Alexandrian patriarch Athanasius), who initially was a Syrian Christian who through legend-like circumstances found himself in the Aksumite court.
be made that justify the timeous Christianisation of Ethiopia as the indicator needed for Byzantine foreign policy in the Red Sea. Constantine had incited the conflict with the Persians as a result of imperial conflict so as to determine the uneasy balance of power in the East (Fowden 2006:392 The conflict had an explicitly religious dimension, as the threat to Byzantine Christiana Imperium (Latin) (Christian imperial establishment) was the Zoroastrian magical practises of Sassanid Persia. Persia's foreign policy was also extensively engaging significant parts of Arabia, and hence, as a counter measure, the imperial Roman influences had to be commensurate. Roman policy transcended the Himyarite conflict; however, there was an apparent tilt of power in favour of the Persians. Therefore, alliances had to be made to counter the growing influence of Persia. Religion would be a key determinant in the choice of allies as resonant in Justinian's proclamation, mentioned by Ure (1951) that: [T]he first and greatest blessing for all mankind is the confession of the Christian faith … to the end that it may be universally established and that … holy priests of the whole globe may be joined together in unity. (p. 122)

Extensive Roman Christian foreign policy: The case for an Aksumite alliance
The declaration by the emperor Justinian has several implications that are an index of his foreign policy, the first being the emphasis upon the imperial orthodox establishment. The second is how the imperial orthodox establishment was defined by an oecumene [ecumenical or universal agenda] (Hendrickx 2017:10). This entails that the unity derived within Christendom was to characterise the world or rather the conceived empire. This was synonymous with Constantine's Bishopric claims that encompassed the empire and without (VC 4.24;ed. Schaff 1885a:826). This surely had been the sentiment fuelling the continuum of conciliar developments within Christianity as Constantine and the http://www.hts.org.za Open Access same notion would guide the Byzantine foreign policy. This directly shows how a Roman-Aksumite alliance would be inevitable. The Byzantine Empire was surrounded aggregately by pagan Barbarians or non-conformant Christian confessions, and hence to find common Christian cause could guarantee political-military alliances from fellow Christians (Allen 2001:820-828).
As a consequent of the foreign policy of the two empires, the Persians and the Byzantines, there was a clash regarding their client connections. Later in 580 CE, a Jafnid ruler al-Mundhir ibn al-Harith was crowned a client monarch of the Byzantines. These Jafnids who are associated with the Ghassanids were the Roman check and balance upon the Byzantine Syrian-Eastern frontier, thereby securing the Byzantine tax base. The Jafnids were directly involved in the Byzantine-Persian war, as they contributed military units to the Byzantine army in assaults on Sassanians. Indirectly, they clashed with the Sasanian proxies such as the Nasrids.
A similar relationship as that with the Jafnids was secured by the Byzantine with the Kinda tribe (Shahid 2002).
In addition to the Persian alliance, they had local alliances within the Peninsula and further East. Masruq Ash'ar's Nasrid connectionand his explicit advice to al-Mundhir, the Nasrid monarch, regarding the extermination of Christian subjects was an apparent provocation to a Byzantine response (Al-Assouad 2019; Bosworth 1983: 600-601; Kister 1968:144-149). The narrative reads as a repetition of the essential spark to the protracted war between the Sassanians and Byzantine-Rome. The call to exterminate Christians, who were seen by both sides of the conflict as an extension of the nations with an explicit Christian-political establishment, was an outright act of war. Parallel to Constantine's situation with Shapur II, the explicit posturing by Justin as a propagator and custodian of the ecumenical orthodoxy establishment entailed that hostilities against Christianity were directly against the Byzantine empire. Hence, Yusuf/Masruq was extendedly an enemy of Rome and correspondingly his allies against Christianity were embroiled consequentially. Whilst this is the perspective derived from a review of the Byzantine position, an intrinsic look at Ethiopia and the preceding developments in the 4th century CE imply the same effect regarding the antagonism with Yusuf/Masruq. The call to arms by Byzantine extended to Ethiopia was possibly the realisation of the already catalytic religious hostilities between an upcoming Christian empire and a Judaised political establishment.
Byzantine foreign policy in the Red Sea implied connections within both the Arabian Peninsula and the Aksumite east African highlands. The Arabian interests primarily can be argued to have been an outgrowth of the intentions to neutralise the Persian influence. Correspondingly, the Aksumite alliance was possibly consequent of the geopolitical significance of Ethiopia within its region and its identification with Christianity. Harith was a Hujrid, and his kingdom was within central Arabia (Bowersock 2013:137).
The settlement came as peace treaty following the Arabian invasions of Phoenicia, Syria and Palestine. The Byzantine alliance with the Hujrids became more relevant with the nullification of peace between Persia and Byzantine by the Shah Kawad in 502 CE (Shahid 1989:127-129). This is because Persia had significant alliances within the Arabian Peninsula with the Nasrids. The conference at Ramla took place against the backdrop of uneasy relations between Persia and Byzantium as a consequence of the war engagement through proxies. From a deductive viewpoint, Byzantium was in a position of aggregate weakness; they had to ransom captured captains (Timostratus and John), and one of their client monarchs was killed by the Persian proxy al Mundhir (Bowersock 2012 Najran had ranged from trade blockades and correspondingly a siege that consummated in pillaging (Nebes 2010:45).
This had an obvious effect upon the audience based on their religious conviction and side in the Byzantine-Persian conflict. The Persians who had persecuted Christians as an act of subsequent provocation between Sassanians and Byzantium would find common cause with Yusuf. Given that the Jewish sheikh al Mundhir was a Persian proxy, the Himyarite monarch can be seen as seeking international attention from possible allies upon the Peninsula. For Abraham and the cleric Symeon of Berth Arsham, the opposite was true. Symeon would spread these horrible tidings to all Monophysite Christianity; this was a call for holy war (Shahid 1976:143). The actions of Yusuf against the Najran Christians were later resented across the spectrum of religious thought; it would appear even in the Quran, the martyrs are remembered (Ali 1955(Ali -2015Nebes 2010:49;Quran Surah 85.4). The expression of the Quran shows solidarity for the assault against the Himyarite, as it labels them persecutors of women and children: Those who persecute the believing men and the believing women and then repent not, for them is surely the punishment of Hell, and for them is the punishment of burning. (Quran Surah 85:11; Ali 1955Ali -2015 This assertion is derived from Nebes (2010) and from the understanding that the Quran like the Hadith derives from the background of 6th century CE dynamics upon the Arabian Peninsula. This was a scenario that would reveal the relevance of the symbiosis between piety and power in early Christianity; there was need for a Constantinian figure who would rise to defend Christianity on the Arabian Peninsula.

Epics of religious warfare: A clash of proxies, monarchs and faiths
The invasion of Himyar in 525 CE by Kaleb was not the first; this was a subsequent event to emphatically retain power upon the Peninsula. There had been a preceding invasion in the year 518 CE; this had seen the installation of an Aksumite client monarch, Madikarib Ya'fur (Beaucamp et al. 1999:75-76;Gajda 2009 (Kobishchanov 1979:67-73). This meant that in relating with Christian nations, Rome was to retain some form of superiority correspondent to its responsibility over all Christendom. However, the attempt to connect to Ethiopian Christianity, which was distinctly divergent from Roman-Byzantine Chalcedonian orthodoxy and essentially Judaised in its practise, was an acknowledgement of the mutual significance of both parties in the alliance. The trinity was an accepted doctrine amongst both nations. As evident in Kaleb's inscriptions, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit were parts of the Godhead closely aligned with all actions carried out by the Negus (Book of the Himyarites; ed. & transl. Moberg 1924). The polemic that defines the derogatory reference to the 'abominable Yusuf' who was to be 'anathema' implies the religious tone that characterised the conflict. Justin was inviting Kaleb as a Christian brother to fight a holy war against the persecutor of Christianity, Masruq.

Mawai Temawe Masqal [victor through the cross], en hoc signos vinces [by this sign conquer]: Victory themes
The battle accounts as read from the martyrology of Arethas played out as war legend. Within the narrative, the port of Adulis posed as a key position as the battle had to be carried to a land across Aksum. Ships assembled at Gabaza near Adulis were to ferry a 120 000 strong cavalry and infantry force (Bowersock 2013:97). The Negus led an armada of 70 vessels to the southwestern region of the Arabian Peninsula (Cosmas Topos, Wolska-Conus 1968-1973. The Ethiopian army was to be buffered by a regiment from Barbaria (present-day Somalia) (Bowersock 2013:97). A distinctive feature of the Arabian warfare was the countermeasure they took against the Ethiopian armada. As substantiated by rock inscriptions, one of Yusuf's elementary tactics was blockades to trade routes and ultimately military offences.
The Martyrium recounted that Himyarites had a floating iron chain that was intertwined with wooden planks; this was meant to derail the Ethiopian efforts to reach ashore (Beeston 1989:1-6). The chain narrative is retained in South Arabian inscriptions where the chain is titled as the chain of MDBN; this has led to the conclusion that it was in the region of Maddaban (Nebes 2010:45; Figure 1). This is also backed by the existence of a fortress in the Tihama, at Maddaban (Nebes 2010:51).
The chain narrative is also affirmed by 11th and 13th century CE Arabic sources; in explicit reference, the sources recount how there was an Ethiopian cavalry and infantry assault that was blocked by the Arabs by stretching out a chain on the sea to prevent the former's disembark from their ships.
The narrative regarding the chain of MDBN, affirmed as it is, possibly implies an imitation of Persian war etiquette amongst the Arabs. Whilst this assertion borders on supposition, it has to be put into retrospective perspective that Persian-Hellenic warfare was characterised by notable naval sophistication (Hdt Hist 118; Rawlinson 2013:287). Given the resurgence of Persia in the form of the Sassanians and its vivid interests on the Arabian Peninsula, the possibility of this technique being a derivation cannot be ruled out. In spite of the reality of a chain hindrance, Kaleb's Marib, a locale within Southern Arabia (Figure 1) inscription, celebrates how the Negus through divine help managed to make an entrance at the port of Marsa and ultimately defeating Yusuf and destroying the castle at Saba (Gajda 2009:107-108;RIE vol. 1, no. 195, 1991RIE vol. 1, no. 195, -2000. There are political implications of the Marib inscription. Firstly, the positioning of the stele in Himyar and that the inscription was written in Ethiopic or Ge'ez and not Sabaic (Bowersock 2013:100). Apparently, this action connects with the assertive conscious foreign policy of Ethiopia. This redefines the incursion into Arabia as an essentially Ethiopian agenda; this is in spite of the offer by the Romans and the call to arousal by the Byzantine emperor for the Negus to act. Arguably, given the preliminary invasion of Himyar and the entrenchment of the emergent Christian dynasty by the Aksumites, there is a possibility for a substantial fraction amongst the Himyarite population of Ethiopian Christians being resident in the 'client nation as per the Ethiopian claims' (Shahid 1971:iii-iv). Therefore, the war was a rescue effort by the protector of Christianity and also its benefactor Kaleb who also happened to be the Negus over Himyar. Alternatively, the use of Ge'ez was an imperialist endeavour, as Himyar was aggregately under Ethiopian influence. This inscription was meant for all to understand the religious philosophy of the triumphant Negus (King) Kaleb who was magnanimous in comparison to the conquered Yusuf.
The Marib inscription corresponds to the account of Kaleb, which is offered in the Book of the Himyarites, where the Negus is portrayed as giving continuous homilies (Hatke 2011:378-382 Christian genocide and guaranteeing the future of Christianity within Arabia (Bowersock 2013:103).
The preceding deduction by Bowersock denotes the war of Kaleb as to have been mainly religious.
In addition, given the retrospective arguments for the equally political nature of the war, it follows that the war was an index of the complex Christian political matrix that characterised the Ethiopian nation. The preceding assertion is in line with Nebes who argues that religious conflict between South Arabian Jews and Christians cannot be a sufficient explanation for the battle for Himyar (Nebes 2010:40 When looked at detachedly, Ethiopia was creating its own respective Christendom. In light of the claim by Byzantium to the imperial orthodoxy establishment and the generality of Christendom, an independent Ethiopia was a threat to supremacy, and the sought-out alliance was necessitated by Byzantine's declining power against the backdrop of rising Persian influence. The last element to Kaleb's benefaction to Christianity was the literal building of churches. When paralleled to Constantine's promotion of Christianity, the actions of Kaleb appear essentially derivative as consequent of his identification with a later timeline. The greater evidence for Kaleb's building policy is derived from a non-verifiable source, St. Gregentius (Fiaccadori 2006:48-82;Shahid 1979:25-94); there is however confirmation of the building efforts of Kaleb in his first invasion of Himyar. Yusuf's documented attacks on Christians had involved converting their churches into synagogues and burning other churches (Shahid 1971:iii-iv). The accounts of Masruq's Christian genocide at Zaphar and the correspondent destruction are attested to in inscriptions (Jamme 1966:39). There is arguable reason to infer that the church destroyed at Zaphar was the one recorded by Philostorgius as to have been built by Theophilus of India in the 4th century CE (Philostorgius HE Book 3.4;Amidon 1997:40). The preceding observation further affirms how the Negus' policy in Himyar was one of supporting an already established Christianity that was challenged by resurgent persecuting Judaic powers. Therefore, the 6th century CE Ethiopian cathedral at Zaphar was a restoration of a once demolished building. There are other church buildings that although not verifiable are attributed to Kaleb in the life of St. Gregentius (Bowersock 2013:104;Fiaccadori 2006).
After his victory, Kaleb remained a significant ally of Byzantine Rome as confirmed by the visit of Nonnosus as the ambassador to Aksum. The imperial establishment that ensured a client Himyar did not transcend his reign and retirement 3 it would seem, as there were transformative dynamics in Himyar that ultimately saw the resurgence of the Sassanians and subsequently the rise of Islam (Donner 2010:125). However, it is the persona of Kaleb that stands out as a significant feature of the narrative behind the religious war of Himyar and Aksum.
The Negus arguably encapsulates the Constantinian themes.
As defender and benefactor of Christianity and a successful general, Kaleb maintained the continuum identifying the golden age of Aksumite's magnanimity and its Christianisation. Parallel to Ezana, Kaleb stands out as the protector and promoter of the faith that had taken hold of a nation. Kaleb balanced the ecclesiastical-imperial implications of a Christian-political matrix.
From the perspective of the deductive nature of Ethiopianism as a metamorphosis of Ethiopian narratives into commentative insights, the persona of Kaleb remains a definitive figure symbolising the merger of piety and power, politics and religion. This, when viewed with respect to the parallels that are deductible between Kaleb and Constantine, establishes a connection between Constantinianism and Ethiopianism.

Constantinianism and Ethiopianism themes
There is a portrait titled The Image of the Black, which is: This portrait is an 18th century CE Portuguese depiction of Kaleb, a celebrated Ethiopian legend (The Book of the Saints 1.117, Budge 1928:289-293). There are significant elements that are portrayed in the image that relate to the discussion regarding the Constantinian themes replete in the narratives of Kaleb.
3.Kaleb retired into the seclusion of monasticism.
A thematic title for the portrait would be piety and power. Kaleb is here portrayed as both cleric or ascetic and monarch, as seen in his robes that fit either categories and the monk's tonsure. His crown is at the bottom of his feet, a possible reference to how he relinquished his reign for him to retire to ascetism (in the donation of his crown) (Cerulli 1943-47;Meinardus 1965). The preceding notion is debated by the very authors who mention its factuality; however, one arguable reality is the affinity between monarchical and the ecclesiastical establishment, the Abuna and Negus of Ethiopia have always shared an important relationship. The abovementioned notion is decoded as a later phenomenon characterising Ethiopian Christianity in the medieval era, or rather as some have chosen to designate it as the formation of Ethiopian Feudalism (Binns 2017:40-44;Isaac 2013:131;Negash 2018:1-4;Tamrat 1972).
In both hands, the Negus holds symbols of piety and power. Whilst on the one hand, Kaleb holds an elongated spear and dually a standard, on the other hand, he bears a cathedral.
Regarding the spear, the militarism of Kaleb defined his foreign policy with Himyar. In addition, it should be remembered that Ethiopia from Ezana and his predecessors embarked on a regional expansion policy (cf. Bowersock 2013). These were imperialist ambitions; the Negus was not just a (king) Negus, but the (king of kings) Nagashi (Altheim & Stiehl 1961: 234-248;Jamme 1966:39). In addition, the standard embellishes a sign that is also suggestive, a lion like figure holding a cross.
Given the derivate biblical connotations that characterise Kaleb's inscriptions and his Ge'ez name Ella Asbeha, that implies his posture as a Davidic figure who is akin to the Son of God, deductively this represents the Lion of the tribe of Judah motif. In his inscriptions as reviewed, the Marib and Aksumite inscription, Kaleb impressed both New and Old Testament upon his commemorative stele (Jamme 1966 The Lion of the tribe of Judah is a notion that is traceable to the Bible where the figure of a lion is symbolic of victory and majesty (Gn 49:9; Nm 23:24; 24:9; 1 Macc 3:4; Rv 9:17) (Wolcott 2016). The identity of the Negus as Lion of Judah is replete in Ethiopic literary sources (Haile & Macomber 1981). Notably in the Bible, these titles are ascribed to Christ, the second person of the Godhead, who was mentioned extensively in Ethiopian royal inscriptions and upon coins (RIE I-III: 1991-2000. The fact that the lion holds a cross is an explicit argument to this effect. This would also correspond to the apocalyptic Book of Revelation where Jesus is denoted as Lion of Judah and the root of David (Rev 5), and king of kings (Rv 19:10).
This shows how the king essentially drew some parallel representation to the person of deity in the form of the Son of God (a prevalent Constantinian etiquette that defined the sole emperorship (Schott 2008)). Some of the references to the Lion of Judah come to define the Negus complex later and extendedly the derived religion of Rastafarianism (Erskine 2005:47). When the illustrated ideology is positioned within the reality of the Negus' claims as evidenced by the epigraphic and archaeological evidence, the notion that Ethiopia was defined by a complex church-state liaison can be argued as an understatement. What can be said of the 'holy Byzantine-Roman empire', is equally justified for the conceptualisation of a 'holy Ethiopian kingdom'. The parallelism between the Negus and Constantinan institution is arguably explicit; it should be noted that it is a review of these respective parallels that enhances the conceptualisation of the past (cf. Haas 2008). The artist's impression of the standard on the same spear piercing the Himyarite king is derivative, Kaleb emphasises that his victory was granted him by Divine assistance by the Son of God, as evidenced in the Marib inscription (Jamme 1966

Positioning a Constantinian Kaleb within the Kebra Naghast: Conclusion
The focus on Kaleb enhances the perception regarding ancient Ethiopian church-state relations. The reality of a monarchical-ecclesiastical establishment defines in essence the Christian narrative of Ethiopia; Ezana stands out as the first Christian monarch, whilst Kaleb stands out for his external geopolitical Christian policy (Kaplan 1982;Shahid 1976). However, whilst the preceding deductions have received aggregate attention and focus, it seems the dynamic of ecclesiastical-imperial politics has been perceived as to have been a significant feature later during medieval Ethiopia (Binns 2017:40-44;Tamrat 1972). This perhaps being confirmed by the emergence of the Zagwe dynasty as a highly religious-political entity in 1270 CE. Even the Kebra Naghast, the record of the religious-political heritage of Ethiopia was assigned to the Ethiopian medieval era (Piovanelli 2014).
The focus on Kaleb in diversified angles as an index of the Ethiopian early Christian religious-political terrain develops substantial theorem. As a parallel justification, it has to be put into retrospect that despite the entrenchment of the episcopal polity in the medieval era and their corresponding absorption into the feudal establishment, the emergence of an imperial-episcopal Christian phenomenon in the 300 CE remains a key feature in decoding the development of church-state relations. It is an explicit notion that Constantinian momentum is a referral code for religion and governance to this day (Long 2013:100-124). Therefore, the 3rd -6th century CE when there were significant dynamics that redefined imperial and ecclesiastic establishments in both Rome-Byzantine and Ethiopia thereby derives significance as the foundational era to the emergence of a functional feudal system. Moreover, the capacity of the involved monarchs to integrate Christianity within their foreign policy and statecraft is a notable element definitive of this era.
The Kebra Naghast, which as implied in its name is the glory of the kings, shows the intrinsic sensation that defined the narrative of Ethiopian power dynamics. The monarchy of Ethiopia was part of the legend that shaped a national religious identity. Positioning Kaleb within this matrix would be appropriate. It has to be established that there are elements of credibility with the Kebra Naghast that suggests it was more of a derivate document resembling the medieval era's projection of Ethiopian splendour. In other words, the Kebra Naghast essentially becomes a composition of excerpts from earlier sources that was establishing the national orthodox religious propaganda. This theory has been posed by Piovanelli, basing upon the eclipse of Aksumite eminence between Kaleb and the 12th century CE phenomenon of the Zagwe dynasty (Phillipson 2012:227-243;Piovanelli 2014:690). Thereby, the Kebra Naghast was an attempt by the clerical establishment of Ethiopia to compose a narrative of Christian orthodoxy and political dominance. However, there is a hint for a later 7th century CE dating that is proposed by Bowersock, Shahid; the respective view derives from the prominence of Kaleb and the Himyarite war (Bowersock 2010;Shahid 1971Shahid , 1976. Emphatically, Kaleb and the Himyarite war are attestable through epigraphic and http://www.hts.org.za Open Access archaeological data. Therefore, there should be room for a record that was close to the eventualities. It has to be noted that the Kebra Naghast account of the massacres of Najran, and the ensuing battle between Kaleb and Yusuf/Masruq/Finḥas, is derived from an Ethiopic version of the Martyrium of Arethas (Bausi & Gori 2006:106). This narrative that has been morphed into legend corresponds to the international relevance of Ethiopia poised by the authors of the Kebra Naghast. The significance assigned to Kaleb is distinctive; he is the conclusion, the ultimate exhibit of the thesis (Kebra Naghast Ch. 117 ;Budge 2000:197). The parallel nature of the Kebra Naghast to the Book of the Himyarites, Pseudo Methodius, is also implicative; there is an agenda of the international eschatological projection of a religious empire (Minski 2016:1-7;Piovanelli 2013:13;Shahid 1976:135). It has to be placed into perspective as to how Kaleb is positioned within the Kebra Naghast. In a deductive sense, there is an emphatic claim to superior religious statecraft as a defining characteristic of Ethiopia. The preceding would have been efficient propaganda fuel for the medieval Ethiopian dynasty dynamics and extendedly to maintain the aura of a divine monarchy. Figure 2 is a zoomed excerpt of the same map that focusses on the Horn and the Arabian Peninsula.

Ethical consideration
This article followed all ethical standards for a research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.

Funding information
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated agency of the author.