Original Research
Empire as material setting and heuristic grid for New Testament interpretation: Comments on the value of postcolonial criticism
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies | Vol 66, No 1 | a330 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v66i1.330
| © 2010 Jeremy Punt
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 August 2009 | Published: 17 June 2010
Submitted: 11 August 2009 | Published: 17 June 2010
About the author(s)
Jeremy Punt, University of Stellenbosch, South AfricaAbstract
Using postcolonial analysis to account for the Roman Empire’s pervasive presence in and influence on early Jesus-follower communities (early Christians), as depicted in New Testament texts, is both evident (given its usefulness for analysing situations of unequal power relationships) and complicated. The complications are due partly to the material and conceptual potential and constraints inherent in postcolonial biblical studies, as well as to the complexities involved in dealing with empire and imperialism. The study of the Roman Empire, as far as its impact on early Christianity and (in this article) on the letters of Paul is concerned, requires attention to Empire’s material manifestation, ideological support for Empire, and religious aspects – issues that are identified and briefly discussed. Empire can be understood in many different ways, but it was also constantly constructed and negotiated by both the powerful and the subjugated and therefore attention is required for its possible reach, uses and the purposeful application of discursive power in New Testament texts that were contemporary with Empire.
Keywords
postcolonial; empire; Paul; biblical hermeneutics; Roman
Metrics
Total abstract views: 6770Total article views: 15873
Crossref Citations
1. Paulus en mag: Raamwerke en aansprake
Jeremy Punt
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies vol: 68 issue: 1 year: 2012
doi: 10.4102/hts.v68i1.1186